Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fabrizio Leopardi

dblp:436/1602 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-8370-3058ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Learning theory · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
formal explanation
1.012026
Formally Explaining Neural Network Classification · FM (2) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.012026
Formally Explaining Neural Network Classification · FM (2) 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
neural network classification
0.312026
Formally Explaining Neural Network Classification · FM (2) 2026
Logic in computer science › nonmonotonic reasoning
abduction
0.312026
Formally Explaining Neural Network Classification · FM (2) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsatisfiable core generation · 2.0craig interpolation · 2.0SMT solvers · 1.0SMT solver · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Interpreting Logical Explanations of Classifying Neural Networks
Fabrizio Leopardi, Faezeh Labbaf, Tomás Kolárik, Michael Wand 0002, Natasha Sharygina
ESANN1
2026 Formally Explaining Neural Network Classification
abstract
Abstract Neural networks (NNs) are the core of AI-based technologies. However, the degree of reliability in performing the task is an open problem. The explainability of a central task of NNs, classification, is of immense importance. While at the rise of AI-based reasoning, explainability of the NN classification has mostly been done using statistical methods, nowadays, a more reliable trend of formal logic-based methods is gaining popularity. The advantage of the formal approach is that it gives strict and provable guarantees of the classification. Formal methods is a mature field that has delivered a number of efficient computational solutions already applied in the analysis of software and hardware systems. Formal explainability methods naturally have the ability to reuse existing techniques and tools for a newly emerging field of formal explainability of NN classification. This paper surveys existing efforts to compute explanations of neural network classification based on logical abductive reasoning. The abduction approach is crucial for generalizing the results, capturing the underlying behavior of the classifier. We present the existing techniques as instances of a general formalization that allows contrasting them against each other. In addition, we discuss the issue of the quality of explanations, focusing on their key metrics and factors. As an illustrative example, the paper also presents a practical framework, SpEXplAIn , which automatically computes Space Explanations, the most general abduction-based explanations for classifying NNs with provable guarantees of the behavior of the network in continuous areas of the input feature space. The tool leverages an SMT solver compatible with a range of flexible Craig interpolation algorithms and unsatisfiable core generation, and is applicable to a wide range of applications.
Tomás Kolárik, Grigory Fedyukovich, Faezeh Labbaf, Fabrizio Leopardi, Natasha Sharygina, Michael Wand 0002
FM (2)4