Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiaju Xu

dblp:436/7058 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-1120-2079ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Virtual and augmented reality › augmented reality › augmented reality assistance
augmented reality guidance
1.012026
From Structure to Semantics: Hypergraph-Based AR Assembly Guidance with LLM-Mediated Narration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026
Haptics and multimodal interaction › multimodal communication
multimodal instruction
1.012026
From Structure to Semantics: Hypergraph-Based AR Assembly Guidance with LLM-Mediated Narration · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 3.0hypergraph · 3.0a* search · 3.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Structure to Semantics: Hypergraph-Based AR Assembly Guidance with LLM-Mediated Narration
abstract
Effective Augmented Reality (AR) guidance for complex assembly faces a dual challenge: the inability of conventional liaison graphs to represent procedural logic, and the cognitive burden imposed by visual instructions. We argue that the solution requires a more expressive structure to overcome these representational deficits and a narration approach to mediate instruction complexity. Our method first employs an assembly hypergraph to capture the task's hierarchical information, from which an A* search algorithm generates an optimal assembly path. Then a Large Language Model (LLM)-mediated narration workflow is designed to address the ergonomic deficiencies of the machine-centric path. It employs an optimizer to improve fluency, followed by a narrator that crafts the steps into an intuitive instruction narration. A within-subjects user study (N = 24) revealed a progressive enhancement from our method's components. The transition from a liaison-graph baseline to the hypergraph alone improved objective outcomes by reducing task time and errors and improving subjective ratings (SUS, NASA-TLX, TAM, and ARI). Subsequently, augmenting the LLM-mediated narration maintained these gains while lowering cognitive load and elevating user experience and usability. Our findings indicate the value of our AR assembly design and discuss the opportunities of using LLM as a mediation layer for better user interaction.
Xinda Liu, Jiaju Xu, Jian Wu 0033, Guohua Geng, Lili Wang 0006
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.3