Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ann Roy

dblp:437/3087 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 75% Automated reasoning and model checking · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Logic in computer science
formal semantics
1.012026
VNN-LIB 2.0: Rigorous Foundations for Neural Network Verification · CAV (2) 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
neural network verification
1.012026
VNN-LIB 2.0: Rigorous Foundations for Neural Network Verification · CAV (2) 2026
Logic in computer science › formal specification
specification language
1.012026
VNN-LIB 2.0: Rigorous Foundations for Neural Network Verification · CAV (2) 2026
Logic in computer science › type theory
type systems
1.012026
VNN-LIB 2.0: Rigorous Foundations for Neural Network Verification · CAV (2) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

agda theorem proving · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 VNN-LIB 2.0: Rigorous Foundations for Neural Network Verification
abstract
Abstract Neural network verification is an active and rapidly maturing research area, with a growing ecosystem of solvers and tools. The VNN-LIB standard was introduced to support interoperability in this ecosystem, but Version 1.0 has several serious short-comings as a formal foundation: it lacks a precise syntax, semantics, and type system, offers limited expressivity, and relies on externally defined ONNX models whose semantics are informal and constantly evolving. The latter distinguishes VNN-LIB from established standards such as SMT-LIB, where queries are self-contained and have fixed semantics. In this paper we address these challenges by developing the theoretical foundations of VNN-LIB 2.0. Our key contribution is the introduction of the notion of a network theory , which abstractly characterises the minimal semantic interface required from a neural network model format. This abstraction enables VNN-LIB to be defined independently of any specific ONNX version while remaining compatible with evolving model representations. Building on this foundation, we present a formal syntax for a more expressive query language, a type system for it over the numeric domains provided by the network theory, and finally a formal semantics. To ensure internal consistency, the standard is mechanised in the Agda theorem prover. VNN-LIB 2.0 therefore provides robust and rigorous foundations for trustworthy neural network verification.
Ann Roy, Allen Antony, Andrea Gimelli, Matthew L. Daggitt
CAV (2)1