Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oren Ciolli

dblp:438/1776 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Computational geometry · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 50%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
geometric approximation
0.912025
Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025
Computational geometry
geometric optimization
0.912025
Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning and data management
learning for optimization
0.312025
Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sumformer · 1.7neural network · 1.7encode-process-decode · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems
abstract
Neural networks offer a promising data-driven approach to tackle computationally challenging optimization problems. In this work, we introduce neural approximation frameworks for a family of geometric "extent measure" problems, including shape-fitting descriptors (e.g. minimum enclosing ball or annulus). Central to our approach is the \textit{alignment} of our neural model with a new variant of the classical $\varepsilon$-kernel technique from computational geometry. In particular, we develop a new relaxed-$\varepsilon$-kernel theory that maintains the approximation guarantees of the classical $\varepsilon$-kernels but with the crucial benefit that it can be easily implemented with \textit{bounded model complexity} (i.e, constant number of parameters) by the simple SumFormer neural network. This leads to a simple neural model to approximate objects such as the directional width of any input point set, and empirically shows excellent out-of-distribution generalization. Many geometric extent measures, such as the minimum enclosing spherical shell, cannot be directly captured by $\varepsilon$-kernels. To this end, we show that an encode-process-decode framework with our kernel approximating NN used as the ``process'' module can approximate such extent measures, again, with bounded model complexity where parameters scale only with the approximation error $\varepsilon$ and not the size of the input set. Empirical results on diverse point‐cloud datasets demonstrate the practical performance of our models.
Samantha Chen 0001, Oren Ciolli, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Yusu Wang 0001
NeurIPS2