Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oren Ciolli
dblp:438/1776
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational geometry · 50% Approximation and online algorithms · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
geometric approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational geometry
geometric optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning and data management
learning for optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sumformer · 1.7neural network · 1.7encode-process-decode · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Effective Neural Approximations for Geometric Optimization ProblemsabstractNeural networks offer a promising data-driven approach to tackle computationally challenging optimization problems.
In this work, we introduce neural approximation frameworks for a family of geometric "extent measure" problems, including shape-fitting descriptors (e.g. minimum enclosing ball or annulus).
Central to our approach is the \textit{alignment} of our neural model with a new variant of the classical $\varepsilon$-kernel technique from computational geometry.
In particular, we develop a new relaxed-$\varepsilon$-kernel theory that maintains the approximation guarantees of the classical $\varepsilon$-kernels but with the crucial benefit that it can be easily implemented with \textit{bounded model complexity} (i.e, constant number of parameters) by the simple SumFormer neural network.
This leads to a simple neural model to approximate objects such as the directional width of any input point set, and empirically shows excellent out-of-distribution generalization.
Many geometric extent measures, such as the minimum enclosing spherical shell, cannot be directly captured by $\varepsilon$-kernels.
To this end, we show that an encode-process-decode framework with our kernel approximating NN used as the ``process'' module can approximate such extent measures, again, with bounded model complexity where parameters scale only with the approximation error $\varepsilon$ and not the size of the input set.
Empirical results on diverse point‐cloud datasets demonstrate the practical performance of our models. Samantha Chen 0001, Oren Ciolli, Anastasios Sidiropoulos, Yusu Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |