Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lisa Schmors

dblp:439/0775 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.912025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis
0.912025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural population decoding
0.912025
TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neighbor embedding · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 TRACE: Contrastive learning for multi-trial time series data in neuroscience
abstract
Modern neural recording techniques such as two-photon imaging or Neuropixel probes allow to acquire vast time-series datasets with responses of hundreds or thousands of neurons. Contrastive learning is a powerful self-supervised framework for learning representations of complex datasets. Existing applications for neural time series rely on generic data augmentations and do not exploit the multi-trial data structure inherent in many neural datasets. Here we present TRACE, a new contrastive learning framework that averages across different subsets of trials to generate positive pairs. TRACE allows to directly learn a two-dimensional embedding, combining ideas from contrastive learning and neighbor embeddings. We show that TRACE outperforms other methods, resolving fine response differences in simulated data. Further, using in vivo recordings, we show that the representations learned by TRACE capture both biologically relevant continuous variation, cell-type-related cluster structure, and can assist data quality control.
Lisa Schmors, Dominic Gonschorek, Jan Niklas Böhm, Yongrong Qiu, Na Zhou, Dmitry Kobak, Andreas S. Tolias, Fabian H. Sinz, Jacob Reimer, Katrin Franke, Sebastian Damrich, Philipp Berens
NeurIPS1