Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rose Gurung
dblp:439/1094
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Learning theory · 23% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification › prototype-based classification
prototypical network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair Reasoning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
geometric interpretation · 0.9case-based reasoning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ProtoPairNet: Interpretable Regression through Prototypical Pair ReasoningabstractWe present Prototypical Pair Network (ProtoPairNet), a novel interpretable architecture that combines deep learning with case-based reasoning to predict continuous targets. While prototype-based models have primarily addressed image classification with discrete outputs, extending these methods to continuous targets, such as regression, poses significant challenges. Existing architectures which rely heavily on one-to-one comparison with prototypes lack the directional information necessary for continuous predictions. Our method redefines the role of prototypes in such tasks by incorporating prototypical pairs into the reasoning process. Predictions are derived based on the input's relative dissimilarities to these pairs, leveraging an intuitive geometric interpretation. Our method further reduces the complexity of the reasoning process by relying on the single most relevant pair of prototypes, rather than all prototypes in the model as was done in prior works. Our model is versatile enough to be used in both vision-based regression and continuous control in reinforcement learning. Our experiments demonstrate that ProtoPairNet achieves performance on par with its black-box counterparts across these tasks. Comprehensive analyses confirm the meaningfulness of prototypical pairs and the faithfulness of our model’s interpretations, and extensive user studies highlight our model's improved interpretability over existing methods. Rose Gurung, Ronilo J. Ragodos, Chiyu Ma, Tong Wang 0011 |
NeurIPS | 1 |