Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Majed Dodin
dblp:439/1119
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
a/b testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
sequential testing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
threshold crossing bound · 1.7maximal inequality · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | YEAST: Yet Another Sequential TestabstractThe online evaluation of machine learning models is typically conducted through A/B experiments. Sequential statistical tests are valuable tools for analysing these experiments, as they enable researchers to stop data collection early without increasing the risk of false discoveries. However, existing sequential tests either limit the number of interim analyses or suffer from low statistical power. In this paper, we introduce a novel sequential test designed for the continuous monitoring of A/B experiments. We validate our method using semi-synthetic simulations and demonstrate that it outperforms current state-of-the-art sequential testing approaches. Our method is derived using a new technique that inverts a bound on the probability of threshold crossing, based on a classical maximal inequality. Alexey Kurennoy, Majed Dodin, Tural Gurbanov, Ana Peleteiro-Ramallo |
NeurIPS | 2 |