Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zi Yuan (Nick) Huang
dblp:439/1263
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Learning theory · 44% Generative modeling · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › posterior inference
bayesian inverse problems |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How many measurements are enough? Bayesian recovery in inverse problems with general distributions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How many measurements are enough? Bayesian recovery in inverse problems with general distributions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How many measurements are enough? Bayesian recovery in inverse problems with general distributions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
posterior sampling · 0.9covering number · 0.9concentration bounds · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | How many measurements are enough? Bayesian recovery in inverse problems with general distributionsabstractWe study the sample complexity of Bayesian recovery for solving inverse problems with general prior, forward operator and noise distributions. We consider posterior sampling according to an approximate prior $\mathcal{P}$, and establish sufficient conditions for stable and accurate recovery with high probability. Our main result is a non-asymptotic bound that shows that the sample complexity depends on (i) the intrinsic complexity of $\mathcal{P}$, quantified by its *approximate covering number*, and (ii) concentration bounds for the forward operator and noise distributions. As a key application, we specialize to generative priors, where $\mathcal{P}$ is the pushforward of a latent distribution via a Deep Neural Network (DNN). We show that the sample complexity scales log-linearly with the latent dimension $k$, thus establishing the efficacy of DNN-based priors. Generalizing existing results on deterministic (i.e., non-Bayesian) recovery for the important problem of random sampling with an orthogonal matrix $U$, we show how the sample complexity is determined by the *coherence* of $U$ with respect to the support of $\mathcal{P}$. Hence, we establish that coherence plays a fundamental role in Bayesian recovery as well. Overall, our framework unifies and extends prior work, providing rigorous guarantees for the sample complexity of solving Bayesian inverse problems with arbitrary distributions. Ben Adcock, Zi Yuan (Nick) Huang |
NeurIPS | 2 |