Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pierre Fihey
dblp:439/3064
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Time series and sequential data · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
embedding geometry |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
text anomaly detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity-trained embeddings · 1.0post-processing of embeddings · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy MitigationabstractAnomaly detection aims at distinguishing between in-distribution samples, which belong to the same distribution as the training set, and out-of-distribution samples, which lie outside of it.In textual anomaly detection, recent approaches routinely apply anomaly detection algorithms directly to embeddings extracted from pre-trained embedding models (two-stage approaches).However, the geometric properties of pre-trained embeddings can hinder the effectiveness of detection algorithms, which often rely on distance-based measures.In this work, we first highlight the relevance of similaritytrained models for textual anomaly detection.Beyond being trained to capture semantic similarities, these models also exhibit geometric properties that appear better suited to detection algorithms.We further demonstrate that, besides model choice, a simple post-processing step can significantly improve anomaly detection by adapting embeddings to the assumptions made by classical detection algorithms.The bulk of our experiments is done on a reformulation of the classification tasks from the MTEB benchmark into anomaly detection tasks 1 . Pierre Fihey, Matthieu Labeau, Pavlo Mozharovskyi |
ACL (1) | 1 |