Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Geonwoo Hong

dblp:439/4421 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 56% Efficient and distributed learning · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
1.012026
GMoE: Global Mixture of Experts with Logit Propagation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › mixture of experts
sparse mixture-of-experts
1.012026
GMoE: Global Mixture of Experts with Logit Propagation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
mixture of experts
0.312026
GMoE: Global Mixture of Experts with Logit Propagation · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logit propagation · 1.0GRU-based routing · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 GMoE: Global Mixture of Experts with Logit Propagation
abstract
Sparse Mixture of Experts (SMoE) architectures reduce computational cost by activating only a subset of experts per token, yet they often retain large memory footprints and exhibit significant redundancy, both within and across layers.We propose GMoE, a sparse MoE architecture designed to explicitly address these inefficiencies.Instead of maintaining separate expert sets for each layer, GMoE uses Global Experts shared across all layers and adds a Local Expert per layer for layer-specific adaptation.This architecture reuses Global Experts across layers, thereby mitigating inter-layer redundancy while substantially reducing model parameters.In addition, we introduce a Global Router with a GRU-based recurrent component shared across layers and layer-specific routing heads that propagate routing logits across layers.This routing mechanism couples routing decisions across layers, progressively refines routing paths, and helps mitigate intra-layer redundancy.Across diverse language modeling corpora and downstream benchmarks, GMoE remains competitive while using substantially fewer parameters.Routing path analyses and an ablation study show that GMoE reduces cross-layer routing concentration and increases path diversity, with the Global Experts, the Local Expert, and the Global Router all contributing to the gains.The code is available at https://github.com/GEONWOOHONG/GMoE.
Geonwoo Hong
ACL (1)1