Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Egor Kravchenko

dblp:439/8446 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 91% Approximation and online algorithms · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow › maximum flow
dynamic maximum flow
1.012026
Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs · ICALP 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
1.012026
Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs · ICALP 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph algorithms › network flow
maximum flow
1.012026
Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs · ICALP 2026
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.312026
Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs · ICALP 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic graph sparsification · 1.0cut sparsification · 1.0congestion balancing · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Partially-Dynamic Maximum Flow in Dense Graphs
abstract
We give the first algorithms that, with high probability, maintain (1-ε)-approximate s-t maximum flow in an n-vertex undirected, capacitated graph undergoing either only edge insertions or only edge deletions in total update time Õ_ε(n²). For dense graphs, this yields polylogarithmic amortized update time, which was previously only obtained for the special case of uncapacitated graphs undergoing edge insertions. We develop the following two algorithms: - For graphs undergoing deletions, we generalize the congestion-balancing framework from [Aaron Bernstein et al., 2020], which was developed for maximum matching. We then show that this framework can be simulated on cut sparsifiers, which yields significant speed-ups. - For graphs undergoing insertions, we show that the sparsification techniques by Eppstein et al. [Eppstein et al., 1997] can be combined more directly with the techniques from Henzinger and Goranci [Goranci and Henzinger, 2023]. We thereby bypass the need to dynamize the more involved residual graph sparsification approach by Levin and Karger [Karger and Levine, 2015] suggested in [Goranci et al., 2025], and extend their result to capacitated graphs.
Egor Kravchenko, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg
ICALP1