Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kathryn Hoberg Arehart

dblp:44/1121 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing
audio quality assessment
0.212016
The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI) · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2016
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
speech enhancement
0.112006
Speech Enhancement Based on Generalized Minimum Mean Square Error Estimators and Masking Properties of the Auditory System · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech evaluation
speech quality assessment
0.012006
Speech Enhancement Based on Generalized Minimum Mean Square Error Estimators and Masking Properties of the Auditory System · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-frequency envelope modulation analysis · 0.2temporal fine structure analysis · 0.2wiener filter · 0.1masking threshold · 0.1ephraim-malah estimator · 0.1conditional MMSE spectral estimator · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI) Version 2
James M. Kates, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
Speech Commun.2
2016 The Hearing-Aid Audio Quality Index (HAAQI)
abstract
This paper presents an index designed to predict music quality for individuals listening through hearing aids. The index is "intrusive", that is, it compares the degraded signal being evaluated to a reference signal. The index is based on a model of the auditory periphery that includes the effects of hearing loss. Outputs from the auditory model are used to measure changes in the signal time-frequency envelope modulation, temporal fine structure, and long-term spectrum caused by the hearing aid processing. The index is constructed by combining a term sensitive to noise and nonlinear distortion with a second term sensitive to changes in the long-term spectrum. The index is fitted to an existing database of music quality judgments made by listeners having normal or impaired hearing. The data comprise ratings for three music excerpts (classical orchestra, jazz trio, and jazz singer), each processed through 100 conditions representative of hearing-aid processing and listening situations. The overall accuracy of the index is high, with a correlation coefficient of 0.970 when computed over all of the processing conditions and averaged over the combined groups of listeners having normal and impaired hearing.
James M. Kates, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.2
2014 The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI)
James M. Kates, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
Speech Commun.2
2013 SNR is not enough: Noise modulation and speech quality
abstract
Speech quality metrics are used to predict quality under a variety of noise and distortion conditions. A simple metric for noisy speech is the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which gives the ratio of the long-term average speech power to the long-term average noise power. However, the average noise level fails to include the impact of the noise amplitude modulation on speech quality judgments. This paper reviews how the noise characteristics affect quality ratings even when the SNR is held constant. In one study, ratings for speech combined with stationary Gaussian noise are compared to ratings for noise having the same envelope modulation as the speech. In a second study, ratings for speech combined with continuous noise or multi-talker babble are compared to speech where the interference is gated off during the silent intervals in the stimulus. An accurate quality metric must take into account the modulation as well as the intensity of the noise, and the implications for speech quality metrics are discussed.
James M. Kates, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
ICASSP2
2006 Speech Enhancement Based on Generalized Minimum Mean Square Error Estimators and Masking Properties of the Auditory System
abstract
In this paper, the family of conditional minimum mean square error (MMSE) spectral estimators is studied which take on the form (E(XEalphap/|Xp+ Dp|))1alpha/, where Xpis the clean speech spectrum, and Dpis the noise spectrum, resulting in a generalized MMSE estimator (GMMSE). The degree of noise suppression versus musical tone artifacts of these estimators is studied. The tradeoffs in selection of (alpha), across noise spectral structure and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) level, are also considered. Members of this family of estimators include the Ephraim-Malah (EM) amplitude estimator and, for high SNRs, the Wiener Filter. It is shown that the colorless residual noise observed in the EM estimator is a characteristic of this general family of estimators. An application of these estimators in an auditory enhancement scheme using the masking threshold of the human auditory system is formulated, resulting in the GMMSE-auditory masking threshold (AMT) enhancement method. Finally, a detailed evaluation of the proposed algorithms is performed over the phonetically balanced TIMIT database and the National Gallery of the Spoken Word (NGSW) audio archive using subjective and objective speech quality measures. Results show that the proposed GMMSE-AMT outperforms MMSE and log-MMSE enhancement methods using a detailed phoneme-based objective quality analysis
John H. L. Hansen, V. Radhakrishnan, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
2004 Speech enhancement based on a combined multi-channel array with constrained iterative and auditory masked processing
abstract
While a number of studies have investigated various speech enhancement and noise suppression schemes, most consider either a single channel or array processing framework. Clearly there are potential advantages in leveraging the strengths of array processing solutions in suppressing noise from a direction other than the speaker, with that seen in single channel methods that include speech spectral constraints or psychoacoustically motivated processing. In this paper, we propose to integrate a combined fixed/adaptive beamforming algorithm (CFA-BF) for speech enhancement with two single channel methods based on speech spectral constrained iterative processing (Auto-LSP), and an auditory masked threshold based method using equivalent rectangular bandwidth filtering (GMMSE-AMTERB). After formulating the method, we evaluate performance on a subset of the TIMIT corpus with four real noise sources. We demonstrate a consistent level of noise suppression and voice communication quality improvement using the proposed method as reflected by an overall average 26dB increase in SegSNR from the original degraded audio corpus.
Xianxian Zhang, John H. L. Hansen, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart
ICASSP (1)3
2004 In-vehicle based speech processing for hearing impaired subjects
Xianxian Zhang, John H. L. Hansen, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart, Jessica Rossi-Katz
INTERSPEECH3
2003 Perceptual based speech enhancement for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals
Ajay Natarajan, John H. L. Hansen, Kathryn Hoberg Arehart, Jessica Rossi-Katz
INTERSPEECH3
2003 Evaluation of an auditory masked threshold noise suppression algorithm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
Kathryn Hoberg Arehart, John H. L. Hansen, Stephen Gallant, Laura Kalstein
Speech Commun.1