Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Salma Essafi
dblp:44/1355
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 78% 3D vision · 22% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
shape prior |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Hierarchical 3D diffusion wavelet shape priors · ICCV 2009 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation
hierarchical shape representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Hierarchical 3D diffusion wavelet shape priors · ICCV 2009 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape modeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Hierarchical 3D diffusion wavelet shape priors · ICCV 2009 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
medical image segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Hierarchical 3D diffusion wavelet shape priors · ICCV 2009 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d shape modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Sparsity, redundancy and optimal image support towards knowledge-based segmentation · CVPR 2008 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape modeling
statistical shape model |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Sparsity, redundancy and optimal image support towards knowledge-based segmentation · CVPR 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diffusion wavelets · 0.3coarse-to-fine optimization · 0.3sparse shape representation · 0.1control-point shape model · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 3D Knowledge-Based Segmentation Using Pose-Invariant Higher-Order Graphs
Chaohui Wang, Olivier Teboul, Fabrice Michel, Salma Essafi, Nikos Paragios |
MICCAI (3) | 4 |
| 2009 | Hierarchical 3D diffusion wavelet shape priorsabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel representation of prior knowledge for image segmentation, using diffusion wavelets that can reflect arbitrary continuous interdependencies in shape data. The application of diffusion wavelets has, so far, largely been confined to signal processing. In our approach, and in contrast to state-of-the-art methods, we optimize the coefficients, the number and the position of landmarks, and the object topology - the domain on which the wavelets are defined - during the model learning phase, in a coarse-to-fine manner. The resulting paradigm supports hierarchies both in the model and the search space, can encode complex geometric and photometric dependencies of the structure of interest, and can deal with arbitrary topologies. We report results on two challenging medical data sets, that illustrate the impact of the soft parameterization and the potential of the diffusion operator. Salma Essafi, Georg Langs, Nikos Paragios |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2009 | Left Ventricle Segmentation Using Diffusion Wavelets and Boosting
Salma Essafi, Georg Langs, Nikos Paragios |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |
| 2008 | Sparsity, redundancy and optimal image support towards knowledge-based segmentationabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel approach to model shape variations. It encodes sparsity, exploits geometric redundancy, and accounts for the different degrees of local variation and image support. In this context we consider a control-point based shape representation. Their sparse distribution is derived based on a shape model metric learned from the training data, and the ambiguity of local appearance with regard to segmentation changes. The resulting sparse model of the object improves reconstruction and search behavior, in particular for data that exhibit a heterogeneous distribution of image information and shape complexity. Furthermore, it goes beyond conventional image-based segmentation approaches since it is able to identify reliable image structures which are then encoded within the model and used to determine the optimal segmentation map. We report promising experimental results comparing our approach with standard models on MRI data of calf muscles - an application where traditional image-based methods fail - and CT data of the left heart ventricle. Salma Essafi, Georg Langs, Nikos Paragios |
CVPR | 1 |