Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Preetha Appan

dblp:44/1624 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › temporal data visualization
event exploration
0.012004
Networked multimedia event expsoration · ACM Multimedia 2004
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia browsing
image browsing
0.012004
Networked multimedia event expsoration · ACM Multimedia 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatio-temporal event exploration · 0.1dissimilarity measures · 0.0dissimilarity measure · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Summarization and Visualization of Communication Patterns in a Large-Scale Social Network
Preetha Appan, Hari Sundaram, Belle L. Tseng
PAKDD1
2005 Interfaces for networked media exploration and collaborative annotation
abstract
In this paper, we present our efforts towards creating interfaces for networked media exploration and collaborative annotation. The problem is important since online social networks are emerging as conduits for exchange of everyday experiences. These networks do not currently provide media-rich communication environments. Our approach has two parts -- collaborative annotation, and a media exploration framework. The collaborative annotation takes place through a web based interface, and provides to each user personalized recommendations, based on media features, and by using a common sense inference toolkit. We develop three media exploration interfaces that allow for two-way interaction amongst the participants -- (a) spatio-temporal evolution, (b) event cones and (c) viewpoint centric interaction. We also analyze the user activity to determine important people and events, for each user. We also develop subtle visual interface cues for activity feedback. Preliminary user studies indicate that the system performs well and is well liked by the users.
Preetha Appan, Bageshree Shevade, Hari Sundaram, David Birchfield
IUI1
2004 Networked multimedia event expsoration
abstract
This paper describes a novel, interactive multimodal framework that enables a network of friends to effectively visualize and browse a shared image collection. The framework is very useful for geographically disconnected friends to share experiences. Our solution involves three components - (a) an event model, (b) three new spatio-temporal event exploration schemes, and (c) a novel technique for summarizing the user interaction. We develop a simple multimedia event model, that additionally incorporates the idea of user viewpoints. We also develop new dissimilarity measures between events, that additionally incorporate user context. We develop three, task driven, event exploration environments - (a) spatio-temporal evolution, (b) event cones and (c) viewpoint centric interaction. An original contribution of this paper is to summarize the user-interaction using an interactive framework. We conjecture that an interactive summary serves to recall the original content better, than a static image-based summary. Our user studies indicate that the exploratory environment performs very well.
Preetha Appan, Hari Sundaram
ACM Multimedia1