Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rudolf Krist

dblp:44/2119 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 77% Embedded and real-time systems · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › application mapping
runtime application mapping
0.112008
ADAM: run-time agent-based distributed application mapping for on-chip communication · DAC 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

nearest-neighbor heuristic · 0.1distributed monitoring · 0.1agent-based mapping · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 ADAM: run-time agent-based distributed application mapping for on-chip communication
abstract
Design-time decisions can often only cover certain scenarios and fail in efficiency when hard-to-predict system scenarios occur. This drives the development of run-time adaptive systems. To the best of our knowledge, we are presenting the first scheme for a run-time application mapping in a distributed manner using agents targeting for adaptive NoC-based heterogeneous multi-processor systems. Our approach reduces the overall traffic produced to collect the current state of the system (monitoring-traffic), needed for runtime mapping, compared to a centralized mapping scheme. In our experiment, we obtain 10.7 times lower monitoring traffic compared to the centralized mapping scheme proposed in [8] for a 64 x 64 NoC. Our proposed scheme also requires less execution cycles compared to a non-clustered centralized approach. We achieve on an average 7.1 times lower computational effort for the mapping algorithm compared to the simple nearest-neighbor (NN) heuristics proposed in [6] in a 64 x 32 NoC. We demonstrate the advantage of our scheme by means of a robot application and a set of multimedia applications and compare it to the state-of-the-art run-time mapping schemes proposed in [6, 8, 19].
Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque, Rudolf Krist, Jörg Henkel
DAC2