Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dong Chen 0025

dblp:44/3371-25 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1052-5658ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Edge and fog computing · 64% Internet of things and sensor networks · 36%
Network and information security
1 paper
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 77% Network security · 23%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 50% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Edge and fog computing › edge analytics
stream processing at edge
0.912025
AgileDART: An Agile and Scalable Edge Stream Processing Engine · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Internet of things and sensor networks
smart home
0.512021
PrivacyGuard: Enhancing Smart Home User Privacy · IPSN 2021
Cyber-physical and IoT security › iot privacy
smart home privacy
0.512021
PrivacyGuard: Enhancing Smart Home User Privacy · IPSN 2021
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › dataflow architecture › dataflow machine
dynamic dataflow
0.312025
AgileDART: An Agile and Scalable Edge Stream Processing Engine · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems
0.312025
AgileDART: An Agile and Scalable Edge Stream Processing Engine · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2025
Network security
traffic analysis
0.112021
PrivacyGuard: Enhancing Smart Home User Privacy · IPSN 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stream operator placement · 1.7distributed hash table · 1.7bandit-based path planning · 1.7traffic obfuscation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ITEMTK: IoT Traffic Exposure Monitoring Toolkit
abstract
The network traffic data produced by the Internet of Things (IoT) devices are collected by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and IoT manufacturers, and often also shared with their third parties to maintain and enhance user experiences. Unfortunately, on-path adversaries could fingerprint users’ sensitive and private information by analyzing these network traffic traces. While there’s a growing body of literature on defending against this side-channel attack—malicious IoT traffic analytics (TA), there’s currently no systematic method to compare and evaluate the comprehensiveness of these existing studies. To address this problem, we design a new low-cost, open-source system framework—IoT Traffic Exposure Monitoring Toolkit (ITEMTK) that enables people to comprehensively examine and validate prior attack models and their defending approaches. During the design of ITEMTK, we also identified a novel image-based attack capable of inferring sensitive user information, even when users implement the most robust preventative measures in their smart homes. We then present a new, initial, prototype-level defense mechanism—PrivacyProtector, which could effectively defend against a wide range of state-of-the-art machine learning-based TA attacks, including our newly proposed image-based TA attacks. ITEMTK’s flexibility allows users’ easy expansion by integrating new TA attack models and defenses to benchmark their future work.
Keyang Yu, Qi Li 0046, Dong Chen 0025
ACM Trans. Internet Things4
2025 AgileDART: An Agile and Scalable Edge Stream Processing Engine
abstract
Edge applications generate a large influx of sensor data on massive scales, and these massive data streams must be processed shortly to derive actionable intelligence. However, traditional data processing systems are not well-suited for these edge applications as they often do not scale well with a large number of concurrent stream queries, do not support low-latency processing under limited edge computing resources, and do not adapt to the level of heterogeneity and dynamicity commonly present in edge computing environments. As such, we present AgileDart, an agile and scalable edge stream processing engine that enables fast stream processing of many concurrently running low-latency edge applications' queries at scale in dynamic, heterogeneous edge environments. The novelty of our work lies in a dynamic dataflow abstraction that leverages distributed hash table-based peer-to-peer overlay networks to autonomously place, chain, and scale stream operators to reduce query latencies, adapt to workload variations, and recover from failures and a bandit-based path planning model that re-plans the data shuffling paths to adapt to unreliable and heterogeneous edge networks. We show that AgileDart outperforms Storm and EdgeWise on query latency and significantly improves scalability and adaptability when processing many real-world edge stream applications' queries.
Cheng-Wei Ching, Xin Chen 0084, Chaeeun Kim, Tongze Wang, Dong Chen 0025, Dilma Da Silva, Liting Hu
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput.5
2024 Configuring Industrial Wireless Mesh Networks via Multi-Source Domain Adaptation
Xia Cheng, Mo Sha 0001, Dong Chen 0025
EWSN3
2024 Safeguarding User-Centric Privacy in Smart Homes
abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) devices have been increasingly deployed in smart homes to automatically monitor and control their environments. Unfortunately, extensive recent research has shown that on-path external adversaries can infer and further fingerprint people’s sensitive private information by analyzing IoT network traffic traces. In addition, most recent approaches that aim to defend against these malicious IoT traffic analytics cannot adequately protect user privacy with reasonable traffic overhead. In particular, these approaches often did not consider practical traffic reshaping limitations, user daily routine permitting, and user privacy protection preference in their design. To address these issues, we design a new low-cost, open source user-centric defense system—PrivacyGuard—that enables people to regain the privacy leakage control of their IoT devices while still permitting sophisticated IoT data analytics that is necessary for smart home automation. In essence, our approach employs intelligent deep convolutional generative adversarial network assisted IoT device traffic signature learning, long short-term memory based artificial traffic signature injection, and partial traffic reshaping to obfuscate private information that can be observed in IoT device traffic traces. We evaluate PrivacyGuard using IoT network traffic traces of 31 IoT devices from five smart homes and buildings. We find that PrivacyGuard can effectively prevent a wide range of state-of-the-art adversarial machine learning and deep learning based user in-home activity inference and fingerprinting attacks and help users achieve the balance between their IoT data utility and privacy preserving.
Keyang Yu, Qi Li 0046, Dong Chen 0025, Liting Hu
ACM Trans. Internet Techn.3
2021 PrivacyGuard: Enhancing Smart Home User Privacy
abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) devices have been increasingly deployed in smart homes and smart buildings to monitor and control their environments. The Internet traffic data produced by these IoT devices are collected by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and IoT device manufacturers, and often shared with third-parties to maintain and enhance user services. Unfortunately, extensive recent research has shown that on-path adversaries can infer and fingerprint users' sensitive privacy information such as occupancy and user in-home activities by analyzing IoT network traffic traces. Most recent approaches that aim at defending against these malicious IoT traffic analytics can not sufficiently protect user privacy with reasonable traffic overhead. In particular, many approaches did not consider practical limitations, e.g., network bandwidth, maximum package injection rate or actual user in-home behavior in their design.
Keyang Yu, Qi Li 0046, Dong Chen 0025, Shiqiang Wang 0001
IPSN3