Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fred Rivard

dblp:44/3455 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › metaprogramming
reflection
0.011998
Safe Metaclass Programming · OOPSLA 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compatibility model · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Safe Metaclass Programming
abstract
In a system where classes are treated as first class objects, classes are defined as instances of other classes called metaclasses. An important benefit of using metaclasses is the ability to assign properties to classes (e.g. being abstract, being final, tracing particular messages, supporting multiple inheritance), independently from the base-level code. However, when both inheritance and instantiation are explicitly and simultaneously involved, communication between classes and their instances raises the metaclass compatibility issue. Some languages (such as SMALLTALK) address this issue but do not easily allow the assignment of specific properties to classes. In contrast, other languages (such as CLOS) allow the assignment of specific properties to classes but do not tackle the compatibility issue well.In this paper, we describe a new model of metalevel organization, called the compatibility model, which overcomes this difficulty. It allows safe metaclass programming since it makes it possible to assign specific properties to classes while ensuring metaclass compatibility. Therefore, we can take advantage of the expressive power of metaclasses to build reliable software. We extend this compatibility model in order to enable safe reuse and composition of class specific properties. This extension is implemented in NEOCLASSTALK, a fully reflective SMALLTALK.
Noury Bouraqadi, Thomas Ledoux, Fred Rivard
OOPSLA3