Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris J. Budd
dblp:44/435 · also C. J. Budd
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4536-1662ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enforcing convex constraints in Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
adaptive mesh refinement |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | G-Adaptivity: optimised graph-based mesh relocation for finite element methods · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
finite element analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | G-Adaptivity: optimised graph-based mesh relocation for finite element methods · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enforcing convex constraints in Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enforcing convex constraints in Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end training |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Enforcing convex constraints in Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surrogate gradient · 1.7sparse vector clipping · 1.7dykstra's algorithm · 1.7r-adaptivity · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | G-Adaptivity: optimised graph-based mesh relocation for finite element methodsabstractWe present a novel, and effective, approach to achieve optimal mesh relocation in finite element methods (FEMs). The cost and accuracy of FEMs is critically dependent on the choice of mesh points. Mesh relocation (r-adaptivity) seeks to optimise the mesh geometry to obtain the best solution accuracy at given computational budget. Classical r-adaptivity relies on the solution of a separate nonlinear “meshing” PDE to determine mesh point locations. This incurs significant cost at remeshing, and relies on estimates that relate interpolation- and FEM-error. Recent machine learning approaches have focused on the construction of fast surrogates for such classical methods. Instead, our new approach trains a graph neural network (GNN) to determine mesh point locations by directly minimising the FE solution error from the PDE system Firedrake to achieve higher solution accuracy. Our GNN architecture closely aligns the mesh solution space to that of classical meshing methodologies, thus replacing classical estimates for optimality with a learnable strategy. This allows for rapid and robust training and results in an extremely efficient and effective GNN approach to online r-adaptivity. Our method outperforms both classical, and prior ML, approaches to r-adaptive meshing. In particular, it achieves lower FE solution error, whilst retaining the significant speed-up over classical methods observed in prior ML work. James Rowbottom, Georg Maierhofer, Teo Deveney, Eike Hermann Müller, Alberto Paganini, Katharina Schratz, Pietro Liò, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, Chris J. Budd |
ICML | 9 |
| 2025 | Enforcing convex constraints in Graph Neural NetworksabstractMany machine learning applications require outputs that satisfy complex, dynamic constraints. This task is particularly challenging in Graph Neural Network models due to the variable output sizes of graph-structured data. In this paper, we introduce ProjNet, a Graph Neural Network framework which satisfies input-dependant constraints. ProjNet combines a sparse vector clipping method with the Component-Averaged Dykstra (CAD) algorithm, an iterative scheme for solving the best-approximation problem. We establish a convergence result for CAD and develop a GPU-accelerated implementation capable of handling large-scale inputs efficiently. To enable end-to-end training, we introduce a surrogate gradient for CAD that is both computationally efficient and better suited for optimization than the exact gradient. We validate ProjNet on four classes of constrained optimisation problems: linear programming, two classes of non-convex quadratic programs, and radio transmit power optimization, demonstrating its effectiveness across diverse problem settings. Ahmed Rashwan, Keith Briggs, Chris J. Budd, Lisa Maria Kreusser |
NeurIPS | 3 |