Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Thomas Wolf 0013

dblp:44/4423-13 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 87% Concurrent programming · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › concurrent programming languages
concurrent object-oriented programming
0.012000
Integrating object-oriented programming and protected objects in Ada 95 · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2000
Programming languages and type systems
extensibility
0.012000
Integrating object-oriented programming and protected objects in Ada 95 · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2000
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Integrating object-oriented programming and protected objects in Ada 95
abstract
Integrating concurrent and object-oriented programming has been an active research topic since the late 1980's. There is a now a plethora of methods for achieving this integration. The majority of approaches have taken a sequential object-oriented language and made it concurrent. A few approaches have taken a concurrent language and made it object-oriented. The most important of this latter class is the Ada 95 language, which is an extension to the object-based concurrent programming language Ada 83. Arguably, Ada 95 does not fully integrate its models of concurrency and object-oriented programming. For example, neither tasks nor protected objects are extensible. This article discusses ways in which protected objects can be made more extensible.
Andy J. Wellings, Bob Johnson, Bo Ingvar Sandén, Jörg Kienzle, Thomas Wolf 0013, Stephen Michell
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.5