Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Thomas Wolf 0008

dblp:44/4423-8 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
0as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
11 papers
Language models and text generation · 29% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7%

Topics — the 29 heaviest of 30, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
1.022022
Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency
0.912025
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws
0.912025
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data curation
0.812024
The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
deduplication
0.812024
The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.812024
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering
0.812024
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
pretraining data
0.812024
The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training › language model pretraining
large language model pretraining
0.712023
FinGPT: Large Generative Models for a Small Language · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › low-resource language processing
low-resource language models
0.712023
FinGPT: Large Generative Models for a Small Language · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
scaling laws for language models
0.712023
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot task generalization
0.612022
Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
collaborative learning
0.512021
Distributed Deep Learning In Open Collaborations · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
dataset bias
0.512021
Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.512021
Distributed Deep Learning In Open Collaborations · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.412020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.412020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › hierarchical representation
hierarchical representation learning
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain dialogue
0.412019
Large-Scale Transfer Learning for Natural Language Generation · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation
pre-trained language model fine-tuning
0.412019
Large-Scale Transfer Learning for Natural Language Generation · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
relation extraction
0.412019
A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.412019
Large-Scale Transfer Learning for Natural Language Generation · ACL (1) 2019
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.212024
GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.212023
FinGPT: Large Generative Models for a Small Language · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation
0.212023
Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models · NeurIPS 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.112020
Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scaling law fitting · 1.5web browsing · 0.8tool use · 0.8filtering · 0.8deduplication · 0.8language model pretraining · 0.7instruction tuning · 0.7data augmentation · 0.7multitask prompted training · 0.6ALBERT pretraining · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
abstract
The current trend of scaling language models involves increasing both parameter count and training data set size. Extrapolating this trend suggests that training data set size may soon be limited by the amount of text data available on the internet. Motivated by this limit, we investigate scaling language models in data-constrained regimes. Specifically, we run a large set of experiments varying the extent of data repetition and compute budget, ranging up to 900 billion training tokens and 9 billion parameter models. We find that with constrained data for a fixed compute budget, training with up to 4 epochs of repeated data yields negligible changes to loss compared to having unique data. However, with more repetition, the value of adding compute eventually decays to zero. We propose and empirically validate a scaling law for compute optimality that accounts for the decreasing value of repeated tokens and excess parameters. Finally, we experiment with approaches mitigating data scarcity, including augmenting the training data set with code data or removing commonly used filters. Models and data sets from our 400 training runs are freely available at https://github.com/huggingface/datablations.
Niklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao, Aleksandra Piktus, Nouamane Tazi, Sampo Pyysalo, Thomas Wolf 0008, Colin Raffel
J. Mach. Learn. Res.8
2024 GAIA: a benchmark for General AI Assistants
abstract
We introduce GAIA, a benchmark for General AI Assistants that, if solved, would represent a milestone in AI research. GAIA proposes real-world questions that require a set of fundamental abilities such as reasoning, multi-modality handling, web browsing, and generally tool-use proficiency. GAIA questions are conceptually simple for humans yet challenging for most advanced AIs: we show that human respondents obtain 92% vs. 15% for GPT-4 equipped with plugins. This notable performance disparity contrasts with the recent trend of LLMs outperforming humans on tasks requiring professional skills in e.g. law or chemistry. GAIA’s philosophy departs from the current trend in AI benchmarks suggesting to target tasks that are ever more difficult for humans. We posit that the advent of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) hinges on a system’s capability to exhibit similar robustness as the average human does on such questions. Using GAIA’s methodology, we devise 466 questions and their answer. We release our questions while retaining answers to 300 of them to power a leader-board accessible at https://huggingface.co/gaia-benchmark.
Grégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf 0008, Yann LeCun, Thomas Scialom
ICLR3
2024 The FineWeb Datasets: Decanting the Web for the Finest Text Data at Scale
abstract
The performance of a large language model (LLM) depends heavily on the quality and size of its pretraining dataset. However, the pretraining datasets for state-of-the-art open LLMs like Llama 3 and Mixtral are not publicly available and very little is known about how they were created. In this work, we introduce FineWeb, a 15-trillion token dataset derived from 96 Common Crawl snapshots that produces better-performing LLMs than other open pretraining datasets. To advance the understanding of how best to curate high-quality pretraining datasets, we carefully document and ablate all of the design choices used in FineWeb, including in-depth investigations of deduplication and filtering strategies. In addition, we introduce FineWeb-Edu, a 1.3-trillion token collection of educational text filtered from FineWeb. LLMs pretrained on FineWeb-Edu exhibit dramatically better performance on knowledge- and reasoning-intensive benchmarks like MMLU and ARC. Along with our datasets, we publicly release our data curation codebase and all of the models trained during our ablation experiments.
Guilherme Penedo, Hynek Kydlícek, Loubna Ben Allal, Anton Lozhkov, Margaret Mitchell, Colin Raffel, Leandro von Werra, Thomas Wolf 0008
NeurIPS8
2023 FinGPT: Large Generative Models for a Small Language
abstract
Risto Luukkonen, Ville Komulainen, Jouni Luoma, Anni Eskelinen, Jenna Kanerva, Hanna-Mari Kupari, Filip Ginter, Veronika Laippala, Niklas Muennighoff, Aleksandra Piktus, Thomas Wang, Nouamane Tazi, Teven Scao, Thomas Wolf, Osma Suominen, Samuli Sairanen, Mikko Merioksa, Jyrki Heinonen, Aija Vahtola, Samuel Antao, Sampo Pyysalo. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Risto Luukkonen, Ville Komulainen, Jouni Luoma, Anni Eskelinen, Jenna Kanerva, Hanna-Mari Kupari, Filip Ginter, Veronika Laippala, Niklas Muennighoff, Aleksandra Piktus, Thomas Wang, Nouamane Tazi, Teven Le Scao, Thomas Wolf 0008, Osma Suominen, Samuli Sairanen, Mikko Merioksa, Jyrki Heinonen, Aija Vahtola, Samuel Antão, Sampo Pyysalo
EMNLP14
2023 Scaling Data-Constrained Language Models
abstract
The current trend of scaling language models involves increasing both parameter count and training dataset size. Extrapolating this trend suggests that training dataset size may soon be limited by the amount of text data available on the internet. Motivated by this limit, we investigate scaling language models in data-constrained regimes. Specifically, we run a large set of experiments varying the extent of data repetition and compute budget, ranging up to 900 billion training tokens and 9 billion parameter models. We find that with constrained data for a fixed compute budget, training with up to 4 epochs of repeated data yields negligible changes to loss compared to having unique data. However, with more repetition, the value of adding compute eventually decays to zero. We propose and empirically validate a scaling law for compute optimality that accounts for the decreasing value of repeated tokens and excess parameters. Finally, we experiment with approaches mitigating data scarcity, including augmenting the training dataset with code data or removing commonly used filters. Models and datasets from our 400 training runs are freely available at https://github.com/huggingface/datablations.
Niklas Muennighoff, Alexander M. Rush, Boaz Barak, Teven Le Scao, Nouamane Tazi, Aleksandra Piktus, Sampo Pyysalo, Thomas Wolf 0008, Colin Raffel
NeurIPS8
2022 Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization
Victor Sanh, Albert Webson, Colin Raffel, Stephen H. Bach, Lintang Sutawika, Zaid Alyafeai, Antoine Chaffin, Arnaud Stiegler, Arun Raja, Manan Dey, M Saiful Bari, Canwen Xu, Urmish Thakker, Shanya Sharma Sharma, Eliza Szczechla, Taewoon Kim 0002, Gunjan Chhablani, Nihal V. Nayak, Debajyoti Datta, Mike Tian-Jian Jiang, Matteo Manica, Sheng Shen 0001, Harshit Pandey, Rachel Bawden, Thomas Wang, Trishala Neeraj, Jos Rozen, Abheesht Sharma, Andrea Santilli, Thibault Févry, Jason Alan Fries, Ryan Teehan, Teven Le Scao, Stella Biderman, Leo Gao, Thomas Wolf 0008, Alexander M. Rush
ICLR39
2021 Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Yonatan Belinkov, Alexander M. Rush
ICLR2
2021 Distributed Deep Learning In Open Collaborations
abstract
Modern deep learning applications require increasingly more compute to train state-of-the-art models. To address this demand, large corporations and institutions use dedicated High-Performance Computing clusters, whose construction and maintenance are both environmentally costly and well beyond the budget of most organizations. As a result, some research directions become the exclusive domain of a few large industrial and even fewer academic actors. To alleviate this disparity, smaller groups may pool their computational resources and run collaborative experiments that benefit all participants. This paradigm, known as grid- or volunteer computing, has seen successful applications in numerous scientific areas. However, using this approach for machine learning is difficult due to high latency, asymmetric bandwidth, and several challenges unique to volunteer computing. In this work, we carefully analyze these constraints and propose a novel algorithmic framework designed specifically for collaborative training. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach for SwAV and ALBERT pretraining in realistic conditions and achieve performance comparable to traditional setups at a fraction of the cost. Finally, we provide a detailed report of successful collaborative language model pretraining with nearly 50 participants.
Michael Diskin, Alexey Bukhtiyarov, Max Ryabinin, Lucile Saulnier, Quentin Lhoest, Anton Sinitsin, Dmitry Popov 0003, Dmitry V. Pyrkin, Maxim Kashirin, Alexander Borzunov, Albert Villanova del Moral, Denis Mazur, Ilia Kobelev, Yacine Jernite, Thomas Wolf 0008, Gennady Pekhimenko
NeurIPS15
2020 Movement Pruning: Adaptive Sparsity by Fine-Tuning
abstract
Magnitude pruning is a widely used strategy for reducing model size in pure supervised learning; however, it is less effective in the transfer learning regime that has become standard for state-of-the-art natural language processing applications. We propose the use of movement pruning, a simple, deterministic first-order weight pruning method that is more adaptive to pretrained model fine-tuning. We give mathematical foundations to the method and compare it to existing zeroth- and first-order pruning methods. Experiments show that when pruning large pretrained language models, movement pruning shows significant improvements in high-sparsity regimes. When combined with distillation, the approach achieves minimal accuracy loss with down to only 3% of the model parameters.
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Alexander M. Rush
NeurIPS2
2019 A Hierarchical Multi-Task Approach for Learning Embeddings from Semantic Tasks
abstract
Much effort has been devoted to evaluate whether multi-task learning can be leveraged to learn rich representations that can be used in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) down-stream applications. However, there is still a lack of understanding of the settings in which multi-task learning has a significant effect. In this work, we introduce a hierarchical model trained in a multi-task learning setup on a set of carefully selected semantic tasks. The model is trained in a hierarchical fashion to introduce an inductive bias by supervising a set of low level tasks at the bottom layers of the model and more complex tasks at the top layers of the model. This model achieves state-of-the-art results on a number of tasks, namely Named Entity Recognition, Entity Mention Detection and Relation Extraction without hand-engineered features or external NLP tools like syntactic parsers. The hierarchical training supervision induces a set of shared semantic representations at lower layers of the model. We show that as we move from the bottom to the top layers of the model, the hidden states of the layers tend to represent more complex semantic information.
Victor Sanh, Thomas Wolf 0008, Sebastian Ruder
AAAI2
2019 Large-Scale Transfer Learning for Natural Language Generation
abstract
Large-scale pretrained language models define state of the art in natural language processing, achieving outstanding performance on a variety of tasks.We study how these architectures can be applied and adapted for natural language generation, comparing a number of architectural and training schemes.We focus in particular on open-domain dialog as a typical high entropy generation task, presenting and comparing different architectures for adapting pretrained models with state of the art results.
Sergey Golovanov, Rauf Kurbanov, Sergey I. Nikolenko, Kyryl Truskovskyi, Alexander Tselousov, Thomas Wolf 0008
ACL (1)6