Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hédi Nabli

dblp:44/4553 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-3020-9206ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 4 first-authorComputer networks · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
performability analysis
0.122010
Comment on "Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm" · IEEE Trans. Computers 2010
Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Computers 1996
Performance modeling and evaluation › markov models › markov reward model
cumulative reward distribution
0.112010
Comment on "Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm" · IEEE Trans. Computers 2010
Performance modeling and evaluation › markov models
markov reward model
0.112010
Comment on "Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm" · IEEE Trans. Computers 2010
Performance modeling and evaluation
markov models
0.011996
Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm · IEEE Trans. Computers 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

homogeneous markov process · 0.1truncation · 0.0polynomial-time algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 General approach for video traffic: from modeling to optimization
Wassim Abbessi, Hédi Nabli
Multim. Syst.2
2016 A unified algorithm for finite and infinite buffer content distribution of Markov fluid models
Hédi Nabli, Wassim Abbessi, Haikel Ouerghi
Perform. Evaluation1
2010 Comment on "Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm"
abstract
The paper "performability analysis: a new algorithmrdquo describes an algorithm for computing the complementary distribution of the accumulated reward over an interval of time in a homogeneous Markov process. In this comment, we show that in two particular cases, one of which is quite frequent, small modifications of the algorithm may reduce significantly its storage complexity.
Víctor Suñé, Juan A. Carrasco, Hédi Nabli, Bruno Sericola
IEEE Trans. Computers3
2009 Comparison of computation methods for the steady-state markov modulated fluid queues
abstract
The Markov-modulated fluid models are mathematical tools widely used in telecommunication networks modeling. These models represent the discrete entities of the network traffic as a continuous fluid whose rates depend on a Markov process. The study of the fluid models shows that they are governed by a linear differential system. Many techniques are used to solve these equations such as spectral analysis, Laplace transforms, orthogonal polynomials and recurrence relations. The purpose of this work is to study mathematically the resolution techniques and to compare them in term of computational complexity, accuracy and stability.
Wassim Abbessi, Hédi Nabli
ISCC2
2009 Uniqueness of asymptotic solution for general Markov fluid models
Hédi Nabli, Haikel Ouerghi
Perform. Evaluation1
2004 Asymptotic solution of stochastic fluid models
Hédi Nabli
Perform. Evaluation1
1996 Performability Analysis: A New Algorithm
abstract
We propose, in this paper, a new algorithm to compute the performability distribution. Its computational complexity is polynomial and it deals only with nonnegative numbers bounded by one. This important property allows us to determine truncation steps and so to improve the execution time of the algorithm.
Hédi Nabli, Bruno Sericola
IEEE Trans. Computers1