Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt
dblp:44/5073
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 8 · 6 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 83% Empirical software engineering · 8% Software maintenance and evolution · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000 |
Empirical software engineering
technology transfer |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized company · ICSE 2000 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quality improvement paradigm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Empirically Driven Design of Software Development Processes for Wireless Internet Services
Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Daniela Boggio, Jürgen Münch, Alexis Ocampo, Gino Palladino |
PROFES | 1 |
| 2002 | A concept to support process model maintenance through systematic experience captureabstractProcess knowledge gained during process execution is a valuable asset. In practice, process knowledge gained during process execution gets lost because it is usually not made available to a broader audience. On the other hand, it is this type of process knowledge that may help a Process Engineer update and maintain process models. This paper presents a concept and prototype tool implementation to systematically capture process knowledge in the form of annotations. These annotations are, upon analysis, integrated into the process model, thus incorporating experience and allowing users to learn from experience previously gained. Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Roman Reinert |
SEKE | 1 |
| 2002 | Understanding the use of an electronic process guide
Louise Scott, Lucila Carvalho, D. Ross Jeffery, John D'Ambra, Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 5 |
| 2001 | Towards Systematic Knowledge Elicitation for Descriptive Software Process Modeling
Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt |
PROFES | 1 |
| 2001 | Descriptive Software Process Modeling-How to Deal with Sensitive Process Information
Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt |
Empir. Softw. Eng. | 1 |
| 2000 | Process engineering with SpearmintTM/EPGabstractS.791 Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Louise Scott, Jörg Zettel |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2000 | Introducng a software modeling concept in a medium-sized companyabstractDescribes, using the Quality Improvement Paradigm (QIP), how an improvement project aimed at improving the modeling and documentation approach of a medium-sized company (Markant Su/spl uml/dwest Software und Dienstleistungs GmbH) was conducted. We discuss the new modeling approach, which may serve for other companies as a template for deriving their own adapted approach. Further, we illustrate our insights from this project that can help in future technology transfer projects. A major characteristic of this project was that it was embedded in a long-term consulting relationship. Klaus Schmid, Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Peter Knauber, Florian Bernauer |
ICSE | 2 |
| 1999 | Support for the Process Engineer: The Spearmint Approach to Software Process Definition and Process GuidanceabstractThe software development process and its related activities are described, implemented, analyzed, and changed by so-called Process Engineers. Process Engineers provide descriptions of software development processes to Process Performers. Because the processes usually are complex, support is needed for both Process Engineers and Process Performers. This paper reports the development and application of the process modeling environment Spearmint1. The architecture of Spearmint allows for a flexible definition and addition of views which are used for retrieving filtered and tailored presentations of the process models. One distinct view, namely the Electronic Process Guide used for dissemination of process information and guidance of Process Performers, is discussed in more detail. The Spearmint environment has been validated in industrial process engineering cases. Ulrike Becker-Kornstaedt, Dirk Hamann, Ralf Kempkens, Peter Rösch, Martin Verlage, Richard Webby, Jörg Zettel |
CAiSE | 1 |