Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gilbert Caplain

dblp:44/5163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 50% Program verification · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
correctness conditions
0.012002
Correctness properties in a shared-memory parallel language · J. ACM 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic equivalence · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Correctness properties in a shared-memory parallel language
abstract
We study a property of correctness of programs written in a shared-memory parallel language. This property is a semantic equivalence between the parallel program and its sequential version , that we define. We consider some standard parallel imperative language. Within this language, this correctness property follows from the preservation of data dependences by the control flow and the synchronizations. Our result makes use of the semantics of the sequential version only. Hence, through our result, checking the correctness of some parallel program boils down to verifying properties of some sequential program.
Gilbert Caplain
J. ACM1
1988 Toward Automating Recognition of Differing Problem-Solving Demands
Jeffrey Stout, Gilbert Caplain, Sandra Marcus, John P. McDermott
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.2