Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Si Pan

dblp:44/5470 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
programming paradigms
0.011996
Beyond Structured Programming · ICSE 1996
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
structured programming
0.011996
Beyond Structured Programming · ICSE 1996
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Beyond Structured Programming
Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey
ICSE1
1996 Re-engineering Loops
abstract
Loops with multiple-exits and flags detract from the quality of imperative programs. They tend to make control-structures difficult to understand and, at the same time, introduce the risk of non-termination and other correctness problems. A systematic, generally applicable procedure, called loop rationalization, which removes such features and logically simplifies loop structures is presented. This method, which is founded on the principle of separation of concerns, employs strongest postcondition calculations and congruent equivalence transformations to improve loops. A by-product of the process is that it detects a range of defects such as unreachable code and a class of non-termination problems.
Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey
Comput. J.1
1996 A Formal Basis for Removing Goto Statements
abstract
Goto statements detract from the quality of imperative programs. They tend to make control-structures difficult to understand and, at the same time, introduce the risk of non-termination and other correctness problems. A new, formal, generally applicable procedure for removing all goto statements from program structures is presented. This method is based on formal semantics and congruent equivalence transformations. Not only does the method logically simplify program structures; it also detects a range of defects including a class of non-termination problems, unreachable code and redundancy problems. The method can also be used to eliminate recursion.
Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey
Comput. J.1