Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Si Pan
dblp:44/5470
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
programming paradigms |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Beyond Structured Programming · ICSE 1996 |
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
structured programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Beyond Structured Programming · ICSE 1996 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Beyond Structured Programming
Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey |
ICSE | 1 |
| 1996 | Re-engineering LoopsabstractLoops with multiple-exits and flags detract from the quality of imperative programs. They tend to make control-structures difficult to understand and, at the same time, introduce the risk of non-termination and other correctness problems. A systematic, generally applicable procedure, called loop rationalization, which removes such features and logically simplifies loop structures is presented. This method, which is founded on the principle of separation of concerns, employs strongest postcondition calculations and congruent equivalence transformations to improve loops. A by-product of the process is that it detects a range of defects such as unreachable code and a class of non-termination problems. Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey |
Comput. J. | 1 |
| 1996 | A Formal Basis for Removing Goto StatementsabstractGoto statements detract from the quality of imperative programs. They tend to make control-structures difficult to understand and, at the same time, introduce the risk of non-termination and other correctness problems. A new, formal, generally applicable procedure for removing all goto statements from program structures is presented. This method is based on formal semantics and congruent equivalence transformations. Not only does the method logically simplify program structures; it also detects a range of defects including a class of non-termination problems, unreachable code and redundancy problems. The method can also be used to eliminate recursion. Si Pan, R. Geoff Dromey |
Comput. J. | 1 |