Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiaqi Wang 0008
dblp:44/740-8
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 50% Query processing and optimization · 33% Database system architecture and tuning · 17% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
model selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SimpleTS: An Efficient and Universal Model Selection Framework for Time Series Forecasting · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Query processing and optimization › query optimization › graph query optimization
pattern query optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Real-time Workload Pattern Analysis for Large-scale Cloud Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Query processing and optimization
query optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Real-time Workload Pattern Analysis for Large-scale Cloud Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Data mining › time series analysis
time series classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SimpleTS: An Efficient and Universal Model Selection Framework for Time Series Forecasting · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Data mining › time series analysis
time series forecasting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SimpleTS: An Efficient and Universal Model Selection Framework for Time Series Forecasting · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
database-as-a-service |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Real-time Workload Pattern Analysis for Large-scale Cloud Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
online mining · 1.3feature embedding · 1.3classification · 1.3weighted representation learning · 0.7soft labeling · 0.7model clustering · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Real-time Workload Pattern Analysis for Large-scale Cloud DatabasesabstractHosting database services on cloud systems has become a common practice. This has led to the increasing volume of database workloads, which provides the opportunity for pattern analysis. Discovering workload patterns from a business logic perspective is conducive to better understanding the trends and characteristics of the database system. However, existing workload pattern discovery systems are not suitable for large-scale cloud databases which are commonly employed by the industry. This is because the workload patterns of large-scale cloud databases are generally far more complicated than those of ordinary databases. In this paper, we propose Alibaba Workload Miner (AWM), a real-time system for discovering workload patterns in complicated large-scale workloads. AW M encodes and discovers the SQL query patterns logged from user requests and optimizes the querying processing based on the discovered patterns. First, Data Collection & Preprocessing Module collects streaming query logs and encodes them into high-dimensional feature embeddings with rich semantic contexts and execution features. Next, Online Workload Mining Module separates encoded query by business groups and discovers the workload patterns for each group. Meanwhile, Offline Training Module collects labels and trains the classification model using the labels. Finally, Pattern-based Optimizing Module optimizes query processing in cloud databases by exploiting discovered patterns. Extensive experimental results on one synthetic dataset and two real-life datasets (extracted from Alibaba Cloud databases) show that AW M enhances the accuracy of pattern discovery by 66% and reduce the latency of online inference by 22%, compared with the state-of-the-arts. Jiaqi Wang 0008, Tianyi Li 0005, Anni Wang, Xiaoze Liu, Lu Chen 0001, Jianye Liu, Junyang Wu, Feifei Li 0001, Yunjun Gao |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2023 | SimpleTS: An Efficient and Universal Model Selection Framework for Time Series ForecastingabstractTime series forecasting, that predicts events through a sequence of time, has received increasing attention in past decades. The diverse range of time series forecasting models presents a challenge for selecting the most suitable model for a given dataset. As such, the Alibaba Cloud database monitoring system must address the issue of selecting an optimal forecasting model for a single time series data. While several model selection frameworks, including AutoAI-TS, have been developed to predict a dataset, their effectiveness may be limited as they may not adapt well to all types of time series, resulting in reduced prediction accuracy. Alternatively, models such as AutoForecast, which train on individual data points, may offer better adaptability but are limited by longer training time required. In this paper, we introduce SimpleTS, a versatile framework for time series forecasting that exhibits high efficiency and accuracy across all types of time series data. When performing an online prediction task, SimpleTS first classifies input time series into one type, and then efficiently selects the most suitable prediction model for this type. To optimize performance, SimpleTS (i) clusters models with similar performance to improve the efficiency of classification; (ii) uses soft labeling and weighted representation learning to achieve higher classification accuracy for different time series types. Extensive experiments on 3 private datasets and 52 public datasets show that SimpleTS outperforms the state-of-the-art toolkits in terms of both training time and prediction accuracy. Yuanyuan Yao 0002, Dimeng Li, Hailiang Jie, Lu Chen 0001, Tianyi Li 0005, Jiaqi Wang 0008, Feifei Li 0001, Yunjun Gao |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 7 |