Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vanessa Wei Feng

dblp:44/9768 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 96% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 4%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing
0.322014
A Linear-Time Bottom-Up Discourse Parser with Constraints and Post-Editing · ACL (1) 2014
Text-level Discourse Parsing with Rich Linguistic Features · ACL (1) 2012
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.212013
Exploiting Discourse Analysis for Article-Wide Temporal Classification · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction › event relation extraction
temporal relation extraction
0.212013
Exploiting Discourse Analysis for Article-Wide Temporal Classification · EMNLP 2013
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
argument mining
0.112011
Classifying arguments by scheme · ACL 2011
Algorithms and data structures › polynomial-time algorithms
linear-time algorithms
0.112014
A Linear-Time Bottom-Up Discourse Parser with Constraints and Post-Editing · ACL (1) 2014
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic feature analysis
0.012012
Text-level Discourse Parsing with Rich Linguistic Features · ACL (1) 2012
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
argumentation
0.012011
Classifying arguments by scheme · ACL 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

viterbi decoding · 0.4post-editing · 0.4linear-chain CRF · 0.4topical text segmentation · 0.2support vector machine · 0.2rhetorical structure theory · 0.2convolution kernel · 0.2PDTB discourse relations · 0.2rich linguistic features · 0.1classification · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Encoding World Knowledge in the Evaluation of Local Coherence
abstract
Muyu Zhang, Vanessa Wei Feng, Bing Qin, Graeme Hirst, Ting Liu, Jingwen Huang. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Muyu Zhang, Vanessa Wei Feng, Bing Qin 0001, Graeme Hirst, Ting Liu 0001
HLT-NAACL2
2014 A Linear-Time Bottom-Up Discourse Parser with Constraints and Post-Editing
abstract
Text-level discourse parsing remains a challenge.The current state-of-the-art overall accuracy in relation assignment is 55.73%, achieved by Joty et al. (2013).However, their model has a high order of time complexity, and thus cannot be applied in practice.In this work, we develop a much faster model whose time complexity is linear in the number of sentences.Our model adopts a greedy bottom-up approach, with two linear-chain CRFs applied in cascade as local classifiers.To enhance the accuracy of the pipeline, we add additional constraints in the Viterbi decoding of the first CRF.In addition to efficiency, our parser also significantly outperforms the state of the art.Moreover, our novel approach of post-editing, which modifies a fully-built tree by considering information from constituents on upper levels, can further improve the accuracy.
Vanessa Wei Feng, Graeme Hirst
ACL (1)1
2014 The Impact of Deep Hierarchical Discourse Structures in the Evaluation of Text Coherence
Vanessa Wei Feng, Ziheng Lin, Graeme Hirst
COLING1
2013 Exploiting Discourse Analysis for Article-Wide Temporal Classification
abstract
In this paper we classify the temporal relations between pairs of events on an article-wide basis.This is in contrast to much of the existing literature which focuses on just event pairs which are found within the same or adjacent sentences.To achieve this, we leverage on discourse analysis as we believe that it provides more useful semantic information than typical lexico-syntactic features.We propose the use of several discourse analysis frameworks, including 1) Rhetorical Structure Theory (RST), 2) PDTB-styled discourse relations, and 3) topical text segmentation.We explain how features derived from these frameworks can be effectively used with support vector machines (SVM) paired with convolution kernels.Experiments show that our proposal is effective in improving on the state-of-the-art significantly by as much as 16% in terms of F 1 , even if we only adopt less-than-perfect automatic discourse analyzers and parsers.Making use of more accurate discourse analysis can further boost gains to 35%.
Jun-Ping Ng, Min-Yen Kan, Ziheng Lin, Vanessa Wei Feng, Bin Chen 0027, Jian Su 0002, Chew Lim Tan
EMNLP4
2013 Detecting Deceptive Opinions with Profile Compatibility
Vanessa Wei Feng, Graeme Hirst
IJCNLP1
2012 Text-level Discourse Parsing with Rich Linguistic Features
Vanessa Wei Feng, Graeme Hirst
ACL (1)1
2012 Extending the Entity-based Coherence Model with Multiple Ranks
Vanessa Wei Feng, Graeme Hirst
EACL1
2011 Classifying arguments by scheme
Vanessa Wei Feng, Graeme Hirst
ACL1