Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florian Eggenhofer
dblp:44/9844
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-9564-7525ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation › coding region prediction
open reading frame prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HRIBO: high-throughput analysis of bacterial ribosome profiling data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
ribosome profiling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HRIBO: high-throughput analysis of bacterial ribosome profiling data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity search |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | CMV: visualization for RNA and protein family models and their comparisons · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Peakhood: individual site context extraction for CLIP-seq peak regions · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA interaction prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Fast accessibility-based prediction of RNA-RNA interactions · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction › RNA interaction prediction
RNA-RNA interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Fast accessibility-based prediction of RNA-RNA interactions · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
peak calling · 0.6quality control pipeline · 0.5deep sequencing · 0.5hidden markov model · 0.3covariance model · 0.3approximate energy model · 0.1accessibility profile · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | RiboReport - benchmarking tools for ribosome profiling-based identification of open reading frames in bacteriaabstractSmall proteins encoded by short open reading frames (ORFs) with 50 codons or fewer are emerging as an important class of cellular macromolecules in diverse organisms. However, they often evade detection by proteomics or in silico methods. Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) has revealed widespread translation in genomic regions previously thought to be non-coding, driving the development of ORF detection tools using Ribo-seq data. However, only a handful of tools have been designed for bacteria, and these have not yet been systematically compared. Here, we aimed to identify tools that use Ribo-seq data to correctly determine the translational status of annotated bacterial ORFs and also discover novel translated regions with high sensitivity. To this end, we generated a large set of annotated ORFs from four diverse bacterial organisms, manually labeled for their translation status based on Ribo-seq data, which are available for future benchmarking studies. This set was used to investigate the predictive performance of seven Ribo-seq-based ORF detection tools (REPARATION_blast, DeepRibo, Ribo-TISH, PRICE, smORFer, ribotricer and SPECtre), as well as IRSOM, which uses coding potential and RNA-seq coverage only. DeepRibo and REPARATION_blast robustly predicted translated ORFs, including sORFs, with no significant difference for ORFs in close proximity to other genes versus stand-alone genes. However, no tool predicted a set of novel, experimentally verified sORFs with high sensitivity. Start codon predictions with smORFer show the value of initiation site profiling data to further improve the sensitivity of ORF prediction tools in bacteria. Overall, we find that bacterial tools perform well for sORF detection, although there is potential for improving their performance, applicability, usability and reproducibility. Rick Gelhausen, Teresa Müller, Sarah L. Svensson, Omer S. Alkhnbashi, Cynthia M. Sharma, Florian Eggenhofer, Rolf Backofen |
Briefings Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2022 | Peakhood: individual site context extraction for CLIP-seq peak regionsabstractMOTIVATION: CLIP-seq is by far the most widely used method to determine transcriptome-wide binding sites of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). The binding site locations are identified from CLIP-seq read data by tools termed peak callers. Many RBPs bind to a spliced RNA (i.e. transcript) context, but all currently available peak callers only consider and report the genomic context. To accurately model protein binding behavior, a tool is needed for the individual context assignment to CLIP-seq peak regions. RESULTS: Here we present Peakhood, the first tool that utilizes CLIP-seq peak regions identified by peak callers, in tandem with CLIP-seq read information and genomic annotations, to determine which context applies, individually for each peak region. For sites assigned to transcript context, it further determines the most likely splice variant, and merges results for any number of datasets to obtain a comprehensive collection of transcript context binding sites. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Peakhood is freely available under MIT license at: https://github.com/BackofenLab/Peakhood. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Michael Uhl, Dominik Rabsch, Florian Eggenhofer, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2021 | HRIBO: high-throughput analysis of bacterial ribosome profiling dataabstractMOTIVATION: Ribosome profiling (Ribo-seq) is a powerful approach based on deep sequencing of cDNA libraries generated from ribosome-protected RNA fragments to explore the translatome of a cell, and is especially useful for the detection of small proteins (50-100 amino acids) that are recalcitrant to many standard biochemical and in silico approaches. While pipelines are available to analyze Ribo-seq data, none are designed explicitly for the automatic processing and analysis of data from bacteria, nor are they focused on the discovery of unannotated open reading frames (ORFs). RESULTS: We present HRIBO (High-throughput annotation by Ribo-seq), a workflow to enable reproducible and high-throughput analysis of bacterial Ribo-seq data. The workflow performs all required pre-processing and quality control steps. Importantly, HRIBO outputs annotation-independent ORF predictions based on two complementary bacteria-focused tools, and integrates them with additional feature information and expression values. This facilitates the rapid and high-confidence discovery of novel ORFs and their prioritization for functional characterization. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: HRIBO is a free and open source project available under the GPL-3 license at: https://github.com/RickGelhausen/HRIBO. Rick Gelhausen, Sarah L. Svensson, Kathrin Froschauer, Florian Heyl, Lydia Hadjeras, Cynthia M. Sharma, Florian Eggenhofer, Rolf Backofen |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2018 | CMV: visualization for RNA and protein family models and their comparisonsabstractSummary: A standard method for the identification of novel RNAs or proteins is homology search via probabilistic models. One approach relies on the definition of families, which can be encoded as covariance models (CMs) or Hidden Markov Models (HMMs). While being powerful tools, their complexity makes it tedious to investigate them in their (default) tabulated form. This specifically applies to the interpretation of comparisons between multiple models as in family clans. The Covariance model visualization tools (CMV) visualize CMs or HMMs to: I) Obtain an easily interpretable representation of HMMs and CMs; II) Put them in context with the structural sequence alignments they have been created from; III) Investigate results of model comparisons and highlight regions of interest. Availability and implementation: Source code (http://www.github.com/eggzilla/cmv), web-service (http://rna.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/CMVS). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Florian Eggenhofer, Ivo L. Hofacker, Rolf Backofen, Christian Höner zu Siederdissen |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2011 | Fast accessibility-based prediction of RNA-RNA interactionsabstractMOTIVATION: Currently, the best RNA-RNA interaction prediction tools are based on approaches that consider both the inter- and intramolecular interactions of hybridizing RNAs. While accurate, these methods are too slow and memory-hungry to be employed in genome-wide RNA target scans. Alternative methods neglecting intramolecular structures are fast enough for genome-wide applications, but are too inaccurate to be of much practical use. RESULTS: A new approach for RNA-RNA interaction was developed, with a prediction accuracy that is similar to that of algorithms that explicitly consider intramolecular structures, but running at least three orders of magnitude faster than RNAup. This is achieved by using a combination of precomputed accessibility profiles with an approximate energy model. This approach is implemented in the new version of RNAplex. The software also provides a variant using multiple sequences alignments as input, resulting in a further increase in specificity. AVAILABILITY: RNAplex is available at www.bioinf.uni-leipzig.de/Software/RNAplex. Hakim Tafer, Fabian Amman, Florian Eggenhofer, Peter F. Stadler, Ivo L. Hofacker |
Bioinform. | 3 |