Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Homa Babai

dblp:440/7474 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-0243-6521ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 50% Representation and self-supervised learning · 50%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
1.012026
Retrieval-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing · SIGIR 2026
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
1.012026
Retrieval-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing · SIGIR 2026
Computing education › student modeling
knowledge tracing
1.012026
Retrieval-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retrieval-augmented learning · 2.0contrastive learning · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Retrieval-Augmented Contrastive Learning for Knowledge Tracing
abstract
Knowledge Tracing (KT) models aim to predict student performance from interaction histories in order to support personalised learning. However, many learners generate only limited interaction data, making reliable knowledge-state estimation difficult. Recent contrastive KT methods attempt to address this data sparsity through self-supervised representation learning from augmented versions of individual learner sequences, operating within an intra-learner paradigm, where contrastive signals are derived solely from variations of a single learner's trajectory. We advance prior work by proposing RACL (Retrieval-Augmented Contrastive Learning), a knowledge tracing framework that introduces an inter-learner contrastive paradigm, leveraging the observation that students with similar skill profiles often exhibit comparable learning trajectories. Cross-learner structure therefore provides naturally occurring positive and negative examples that are more pedagogically meaningful than synthetic augmentations. Experiments on four benchmarks demonstrate that RACL achieves +1.2% average AUC improvement over state-of-the-art methods, with 97% performance retention at 20% training data, indicating improved robustness under sparse-learning conditions.
Kamal Berahmand, Mehrnoush Mohammadi, Homa Babai, Hassan Khosravi
SIGIR3