Friedman-Simpson’s original program of reverse mathematics, as is also the case for most of standard mathematics, has been developed in classical subsystems of second-order arithmetic. As such, (classical) reverse mathematics presents various limitations from a constructive point of view, since for instance it is unable to distinguish between a statement and its contrapositive (e.g. dependent choice and the bar induction principles). The case of (Weak) Kőnig’s Lemma (WKL) and Fan Theorem (FT) is particularly interesting in that regard: while WKL is well-known to imply FT, and if constructivists like Brouwer rejected the former while admitting the latter, the converse implication has not been much studied for years. It is only recently that a growing enthusiasm for constructive reverse mathematics pushed towards a finer-grained analysis of the connection between such principles. In addition to intuitionistic reverse mathematics, the realizability approach to logical principles adds a computational meaning to purely logical statements. We follow this path to investigate the computational meaning of Brouwer’s Fan Theorem: building on recent work by Lubarsky and Rathjen, we first construct a realizability interpretation of higher-order logic validating FT while refuting WKL. This interpretation relies on a λ-calculus extended with oracles while preserving a notion of continuity for realizers. We then push this approach a step further to show the robustness of this realizability interpretation by identifying, in the abstract and general setting of evidenced frames, sufficient computational conditions entailing FT.