Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Federico D'Agostino

dblp:441/9432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 44% 3D vision · 44% Learning theory · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
What Moves the Eyes: Doubling Mechanistic Model Performance Using Deep Networks to Discover and Test Cognitive Hypotheses · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › biological vision modeling
scanpath prediction
0.912025
What Moves the Eyes: Doubling Mechanistic Model Performance Using Deep Networks to Discover and Test Cognitive Hypotheses · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
deep network analysis
0.312025
What Moves the Eyes: Doubling Mechanistic Model Performance Using Deep Networks to Discover and Test Cognitive Hypotheses · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mechanistic modeling · 0.9deep learning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 What Moves the Eyes: Doubling Mechanistic Model Performance Using Deep Networks to Discover and Test Cognitive Hypotheses
abstract
Understanding how humans move their eyes to gather visual information is a central question in neuroscience, cognitive science, and vision research. While recent deep learning (DL) models achieve state-of-the-art performance in predicting human scanpaths, their underlying decision processes remain opaque. At an opposite end of the modeling spectrum, cognitively inspired mechanistic models aim to explain scanpath behavior through interpretable cognitive mechanisms but lag far behind in predictive accuracy. In this work, we bridge this gap by using a high-performing deep model—DeepGaze III—to discover and test mechanisms that improve a leading mechanistic model, SceneWalk. By identifying individual fixations where DeepGaze III succeeds and SceneWalk fails, we isolate behaviorally meaningful discrepancies and use them to motivate targeted extensions of the mechanistic framework. These include time-dependent temperature scaling, saccadic momentum and an adaptive cardinal attention bias: Simple, interpretable additions that substantially boost predictive performance. With these extensions, SceneWalk’s explained variance on the MIT1003 dataset doubles from 35% to 70%, setting a new state of the art in mechanistic scanpath prediction. Our findings show how performance-optimized neural networks can serve as tools for cognitive model discovery, offering a new path toward interpretable and high-performing models of visual behavior. Our code is available at https://github.com/bethgelab/what-moves-the-eyes
Federico D'Agostino, Lisa Schwetlick, Matthias Bethge, Matthias Kümmerer
NeurIPS1