Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
William (Sandy) Wells
dblp:441/9642
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Information theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › mutual information
mutual information estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Connecting Jensen-Shannon and Kullback-Leibler Divergences: A New Bound for Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information theory › information measures
divergence measures |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Connecting Jensen-Shannon and Kullback-Leibler Divergences: A New Bound for Representation Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational lower bound · 1.7information bottleneck · 1.7discriminative learning · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Connecting Jensen-Shannon and Kullback-Leibler Divergences: A New Bound for Representation LearningabstractMutual Information (MI) is a fundamental measure of statistical dependence widely used in representation learning. While direct optimization of MI via its definition as a Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) is often
intractable, many recent methods have instead maximized alternative dependence measures, most notably, the Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD) between joint and product of marginal distributions via discriminative losses. However, the connection between these surrogate objectives and MI remains poorly understood. In this work, we bridge this gap by deriving a new, tight, and tractable lower bound on KLD as a function of JSD in the general case. By specializing this bound to joint and marginal distributions, we demonstrate
that maximizing the JSD-based information increases a guaranteed lower bound on mutual information. Furthermore, we revisit the practical implementation of JSD-based objectives and observe that minimizing the cross-entropy loss of a binary classifier trained to distinguish joint from marginal pairs recovers a known variational lower bound on the JSD.
Extensive experiments demonstrate that our lower bound is tight when applied to MI estimation. We compared our lower bound to state-of-the-art neural estimators of variational lower bound across a range of established reference scenarios. Our lower bound estimator consistently provides a stable, low-variance estimate of a tight lower bound on MI. We also demonstrate its practical usefulness in the context of the Information Bottleneck framework.
Taken together, our results provide new theoretical justifications and strong empirical evidence for using discriminative learning in MI-based representation learning. Reuben Dorent, Polina Golland, William (Sandy) Wells |
NeurIPS | 3 |