EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shon Feder
dblp:441/9786
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3976-3457ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The TLA+ Model Checker Apalache · CAV (1) 2026 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
symbolic model checking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The TLA+ Model Checker Apalache · CAV (1) 2026 |
Distributed systems
consensus |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | The TLA+ Model Checker Apalache · CAV (1) 2026 |
Distributed systems › distributed system verification
protocol verification |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | The TLA+ Model Checker Apalache · CAV (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
liveness-to-safety reduction · 2.0SMT solving · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The TLA+ Model Checker ApalacheabstractAbstract The TLA $$^+$$ + language has been widely used, both in academia and industry, to specify and reason about distributed systems. This paper presents Apalache , an efficient and flexible symbolic model checker for TLA $$^+$$ + . Apalache ’s engine is based on bounded model checking, with symbolic transitions being extracted from TLA $$^+$$ + specifications and verification conditions suitable for satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solvers being generated from them. Reasoning can be done in terms of safety and liveness properties, with liveness checking realised via a liveness-to-safety reduction. Apalache ’s flexibility lies in its three complementary functionalities: bounded exhaustive verification, for bounded guarantees, randomised symbolic execution, for prototyping and bug detection, and inductiveness checking, for unbounded guarantees. The paper describes Apalache ’s architecture and features, including its support for PlusCal and Quint, two languages that share the same semantic foundation as TLA $$^+$$ + . Industrial usage of Apalache is also presented, together with a case study which illustrates how Apalache can be used to verify the agreement property of a consensus protocol. Rodrigo Otoni, Shon Feder, Jure Kukovec, Andrey Kupriyanov, Gabriela Moreira, Philip Offtermatt, Thomas Pani, Thanh-Hai Tran 0003, Igor Konnov 0001 |
CAV (1) | 2 |