EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Krzysztof Makuracki
dblp:442/0181
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 9% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity › complexity classes › coNP
coNP-completeness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Weighted Soundness for Workflow Nets · CAV (2) 2026 |
Automata and formal languages
petri nets |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Weighted Soundness for Workflow Nets · CAV (2) 2026 |
Automata and formal languages › petri nets
workflow nets |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Weighted Soundness for Workflow Nets · CAV (2) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reduction techniques · 1.0complexity analysis · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Weighted Soundness for Workflow NetsabstractAbstract Workflow nets are a variant of Petri nets used for modelling business processes. Central decision problems are soundness problems, one popular variant called generalised soundness. These problems intuitively ask whether initiated processes can be finalised. We introduce weighted soundness, which strengthens the classical concepts of soundness. In weighted soundness, we bound the weight (typically length) of runs to finalise processes. This allows one to require processes to be finalised within a restricted budget. We provide multiple reasons supporting the relevance of weighted soundness. Our theoretical analysis shows that weighted soundness is provably simpler than classical soundness. Our main result is that weighted generalised soundness is co- NP $$^{\textsc {NP}}$$ NP -complete, while (unweighted) generalised soundness is known to be PSPACE-complete. Our practical analysis shows that on standard benchmarks classical soundness coincides with weighted soundness, if the weight is set to the number of transitions in the workflow net. Furthermore we analyse the Inductive Miner algorithm, one of the most popular algorithms generating workflow nets from event logs. Inductive Miner is known to guarantee the output workflow nets to be generalised sound. We show that it outputs workflow nets that are weighted generalised sound with a weight linear in the size of the event alphabet. Finally, we generalise reduction techniques from soundness to weighted soundness. Such reductions are crucial in implementations of soundness algorithms. Piotr Hofman, Krzysztof Makuracki, Filip Mazowiecki |
CAV (2) | 2 |