Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hans B. Peek
dblp:45/1238
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
modulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Multirate modulation: a bandwidth- and power-efficient modulation scheme · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2005 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › coded modulation
block-coded modulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Multirate modulation: a bandwidth- and power-efficient modulation scheme · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral shaping · 0.1computer simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Multirate modulation: a bandwidth- and power-efficient modulation schemeabstractMultirate (MR) modulation resembles block-coded modulation (BCM), since matrices are being used to transform binary input vectors to multilevel output vectors (blocks) of length K. Unlike BCM, attention is given to the spectral shaping of the signal to be transmitted. Hence, the encoding matrices are designed to provide simultaneous spectral shaping and Euclidean distance. The encoding matrices can be implemented by using MR digital filters of low complexity. MR modulation also resembles partial response (PR) modulation since, in both cases, a transmitter and receiver filter is used with an overall duobinary impulse response. It will be shown that MR modulation has a number of significant advantages compared with PR modulation. Thus, for example, with MR modulation, loss of synchronization or gain control, as can occur with PR modulation, cannot happen in the receiver. Furthermore, computer simulations for an additive white Gaussian noise channel demonstrate that, for a bit-error rate of 10/sup -6/, MR modulation (with K=10) gives a gain of 1.5 dB, compared with PR modulation and symbol-by-symbol detection. However, MR modulation requires a slightly higher bandwidth. It is also explained how, for block lengths K/spl ges/10, MR modulation gives a larger bandwidth efficiency than M-ary pulse-amplitude modulation with raised-cosine pulses and a rolloff factor /spl alpha//spl ges/0.1. Hans B. Peek |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |