Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Elizabeth M. Tsai

dblp:45/1988 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 66% Motion planning and robot control · 34%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › multi-robot control
distributed reconfiguration
0.132005
Algorithms for Fast Concurrent Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2005
Enveloping obstacles with hexagonal metamorphic robots · ICRA 2003
Choosing Good Paths for Fast Distributed Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design › robot mechanism design
metamorphic robot reconfiguration
0.122003
Enveloping obstacles with hexagonal metamorphic robots · ICRA 2003
Choosing Good Paths for Fast Distributed Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots · ICRA 2002
Robotics › Robot manipulation › modular robot
metamorphic robots
0.112005
Algorithms for Fast Concurrent Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2005
Robotics › Robot manipulation
modular robot
0.012005
Algorithms for Fast Concurrent Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.1pathfinding algorithms · 0.1distributed algorithm · 0.1substrate path · 0.0admissibility classification · 0.0graph traversal-weighting · 0.0directed acyclic graph · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Algorithms for Fast Concurrent Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots
abstract
The problem addressed is the distributed reconfiguration of a system of hexagonal metamorphic robots (modules) from an initial straight chain to a goal configuration that satisfies a simple admissibility condition. Our reconfiguration strategy depends on finding a contiguous path of cells that spans the goal configuration and over which modules can move concurrently without collision or deadlock, called an admissible substrate path. A subset of modules first occupy the admissible substrate path, which is then traversed by other modules to fill in the remainder of the goal. We present a two-phase reconfiguration strategy, beginning with a centralized preprocessing phase that finds and heuristically ranks all admissible substrate paths in the goal configuration, according to which path is likely to result in fast parallel reconfiguration. We prove the correctness of our path-finding algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness through simulation. The second phase of reconfiguration is accomplished by a deterministic, distributed algorithm that uses little or no intermodule message passing.
Jennifer E. Walter, Elizabeth M. Tsai, Nancy M. Amato
IEEE Trans. Robotics2
2003 Enveloping obstacles with hexagonal metamorphic robots
abstract
The problem addressed is the distributed reconfiguration of the metamorphic robot system composed of any number of two dimensional robots (modules). The initial configuration we consider is a straight chain of modules, while the goal configuration satisfies a simple admissibility condition. Our reconfiguration strategy depends on finding a contiguous path of cells, called a substrate path that spans the goal configuration. Modules fill in this substrate path and then move along the path to fill in the remainder of the goal without collision or deadlock. In this paper, we address the problem of reconfiguration when a single obstacle is embedded in the goal environment. We introduce a classification for traversable surfaces, which allows for coherence in defining admissibility characteristics for various objects in the hexagonal grid. We present algorithms to 1) determine if an obstacle embedded in the goal fulfills a simple admissibility requirement, 2) include an admissible obstacle in a substrate path, and 3) accomplish distributed reconfiguration.
Jennifer E. Walter, Elizabeth M. Tsai, Nancy M. Amato
ICRA2
2002 Choosing Good Paths for Fast Distributed Reconfiguration of Hexagonal Metamorphic Robots
abstract
The problem addressed is the distributed reconfiguration of a metamorphic robot system composed of any number of two dimensional robots (modules) front specific initial to specific goal configurations. The initial configuration we consider is a straight chain of modules, while the goal configuration satisfies a simple admissibility condition. Reconfiguration of the modules depends on finding a contiguous path of cells, called a substrate path, that spans the goal configuration. Modules fill in this substrate path and then move along the path to fill in the remainder of the goal without collision or deadlock. In this paper, we examine the problem of finding the substrate path most likely to result in fast parallel reconfiguration, drawing on results from our previous papers (2000, 2001). Admissible goal configurations are represented as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). We present a combination graph traversal-weighting algorithm that traverses all paths in the rooted DAG and use this algorithm to determine the best substrate path. We extend our definition of admissible substrate paths to consider admissible obstacle surfaces for reconfiguration when obstacles are present in the environment.
Jennifer E. Walter, Elizabeth M. Tsai, Nancy M. Amato
ICRA2