Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Johannes O. Royset

dblp:45/2058 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0003-3554-7305ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 67% Information theory · 33%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 95% Multi-agent systems · 5%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional statistics
heavy-tailed distribution
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Information theory › statistical inference
confidence bounds
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic programming
sample average approximation
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.912025
Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sample average approximation · 1.7diametrical risk minimization · 1.7receding horizon · 0.1mixed integer programming · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Non-Asymptotic and Non-Lipschitzian Bounds on Optimal Values in Stochastic Optimization Under Heavy Tails
abstract
This paper focuses on non-asymptotic confidence bounds (CB) for the optimal values of stochastic optimization (SO) problems. Existing approaches often rely on two conditions that may be restrictive: The need for a global Lipschitz constant and the assumption of light-tailed distributions. Beyond either of the conditions, it remains largely unknown whether computable CBs can be constructed. In view of this literature gap, we provide three key findings below: (i) Based on the conventional formulation of sample average approximation (SAA), we derive non-Lipschitzian CBs for convex SP problems under heavy tails. (ii) We explore diametrical risk minimization (DRM)—a recently introduced modification to SAA—and attain non-Lipschitzian CBs for nonconvex SP problems in light-tailed settings. (iii) We extend our analysis of DRM to handle heavy-tailed randomness by utilizing properties in formulations for training over-parameterized classification models.
Jindong Tong, Johannes O. Royset
ICML3
2023 Diametrical Risk Minimization: theory and computations
Matthew Norton 0001, Johannes O. Royset
Mach. Learn.2
2009 Probabilistic search optimization and mission assignment for heterogeneous autonomous agents
abstract
This paper presents an algorithmic framework for conducting search and identification missions using multiple heterogeneous agents. Dynamic objects of type ldquoneutralrdquo or ldquotargetrdquo move through a discretized environment. Probabilistic representation of the current level of situational awareness - knowledge or belief of object locations and identities - is updated with imperfect observations. Optimization of search is formulated as a mixed-integer program to maximize the expected number of targets found and solved efficiently in a receding horizon approach. The search effort is conducted in tandem with object identification and target interception tasks, and a method for assignment of these missions among agents is developed. The proposed framework is demonstrated in simulation studies, and an implementation of its decision support capabilities in a recent field experiment is reported.
Timothy H. Chung, Moshe Kress, Johannes O. Royset
ICRA3
2008 Lagrangian relaxation and enumeration for solving constrained shortest-path problems
abstract
Abstract The constrained shortest‐path problem (CSPP) generalizes the standard shortest‐path problem by adding one or more path‐weight side constraints. We present a new algorithm for CSPP that Lagrangianizes those constraints, optimizes the resulting Lagrangian function, identifies a feasible solution, and then closes any optimality gap by enumerating near‐shortest paths, measured with respect to the Lagrangianized length. “Near‐shortest” implies ε‐optimal, with a varying ε that equals the current optimality gap. The algorithm exploits a variety of techniques: a new path‐enumeration method; aggregated constraints; preprocessing to eliminate edges that cannot form part of an optimal solution; “reprocessing” that reapplies preprocessing steps as improved solutions are found; and, when needed, a “phase‐I procedure” to identify a feasible solution before searching for an optimal one. The new algorithm is often an order of magnitude faster than a state‐of‐the‐art label‐setting algorithm on singly constrained randomly generated grid networks. On multiconstrained grid networks, road networks, and networks for aircraft routing the advantage varies but, overall, the new algorithm is competitive with the label‐setting algorithm. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, 2008
W. Matthew Carlyle, Johannes O. Royset, R. Kevin Wood
Networks2
2007 Solving the Bi-Objective Maximum-Flow Network-Interdiction Problem
abstract
We describe a new algorithm for computing the efficient frontier of the “bi-objective maximum-flow network-interdiction problem.” In this problem, an “interdictor” seeks to interdict (destroy) a set of arcs in a capacitated network that are Pareto-optimal with respect to two objectives, minimizing total interdiction cost and minimizing maximum flow. The algorithm identifies these solutions through a sequence of single-objective problems solved using Lagrangian relaxation and a specialized branch-and-bound algorithm. The Lagrangian problems are simply max-flow min-cut problems, while the branch-and-bound procedure partially enumerates s-t cuts. Computational tests reveal the new algorithm to be one to two orders of magnitude faster than an algorithm that replaces the specialized branch-and-bound algorithm with a standard integer-programming solver.
Johannes O. Royset, R. Kevin Wood
INFORMS J. Comput.1