The aim of this paper is to investigate the feasibility of an audio-based context recognition system. Here, context recognition refers to the automatic classification of the context or an environment around a device. A system is developed and compared to the accuracy of human listeners in the same task. Particular emphasis is placed on the computational complexity of the methods, since the application is of particular interest in resource-constrained portable devices. Simplistic low-dimensional feature vectors are evaluated against more standard spectral features. Using discriminative training, competitive recognition accuracies are achieved with very low-order hidden Markov models (1-3 Gaussian components). Slight improvement in recognition accuracy is observed when linear data-driven feature transformations are applied to mel-cepstral features. The recognition rate of the system as a function of the test sequence length appears to converge only after about 30 to 60 s. Some degree of accuracy can be achieved even with less than 1-s test sequence lengths. The average reaction time of the human listeners was 14 s, i.e., somewhat smaller, but of the same order as that of the system. The average recognition accuracy of the system was 58% against 69%, obtained in the listening tests in recognizing between 24 everyday contexts. The accuracies in recognizing six high-level classes were 82% for the system and 88% for the subjects.

In this paper, we address the problem of computational auditory scene recognition and describe methods to classify auditory scenes into predefined classes. By auditory scene recognition we mean recognition of an environment using audio information only. The auditory scenes comprised tens of everyday outside and inside environments, such as streets, restaurants, offices, family homes, and cars. Two completely different but almost equally effective classification systems were used: band-energy ratio features with 1-NN classifier and Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients with Gaussian mixture models. The best obtained recognition rate for 17 different scenes out of 26 and for an analysis duration of 30 seconds was 68.4%. For comparison, the recognition accuracy of humans was 70% for 25 different scenes and the average response time was around 20 seconds. The efficiency of different acoustic features and the effect of test sequence length were studied.