Milner (1984) defined an operational semantics for regular expressions as finite-state processes. In order to axiomatize bisimilarity of regular expressions under this process semantics, he adapted Salomaa's proof system that is complete for equality of regular expressions under the language semantics. Apart from most equational axioms, Milner's system Mil inherits from Salomaa's system a non-algebraic rule for solving single fixed-point equations. Recognizing distinctive properties of the process semantics that render Salomaa's proof strategy inapplicable, Milner posed completeness of the system Mil as an open question. As a proof-theoretic approach to this problem we characterize the derivational power that the fixed-point rule adds to the purely equational part Mil$^-$ of Mil. We do so by means of a coinductive rule that permits cyclic derivations that consist of a finite process graph with empty steps that satisfies the layered loop existence and elimination property LLEE, and two of its Mil$^{-}$-provable solutions. With this rule as replacement for the fixed-point rule in Mil, we define the coinductive reformulation cMil as an extension of Mil$^{-}$. In order to show that cMil and Mil are theorem equivalent we develop effective proof transformations from Mil to cMil, and vice versa. Since it is located half-way in between bisimulations and proofs in Milner's system Mil, cMil may become a beachhead for a completeness proof of Mil. This article extends our contribution to the CALCO 2022 proceedings. Here we refine the proof transformations by framing them as eliminations of derivable and admissible rules, and we link coinductive proofs to a coalgebraic formulation of solutions of process graphs.

Milner (1984) defined a process semantics for regular expressions. He formulated a sound proof system for bisimilarity of process interpretations of regular expressions, and asked whether this system is complete.

By adapting Salomaa's complete proof system for equality of regular expressions under the language semantics, Milner (1984) formulated a sound proof system for bisimilarity of regular expressions under the process interpretation he introduced. He asked whether this system is complete. Proof-theoretic arguments attempting to show completeness of this equational system are complicated by the presence of a non-algebraic rule for solving fixed-point equations by using star iteration. We characterize the derivational power that the fixed-point rule adds to the purely equational part $\text{Mil$^{\boldsymbol{-}}$}$ of Milner's system $\text{$\text{Mil}$}$: it corresponds to the power of coinductive proofs over $\text{Mil$^{\boldsymbol{-}}$}$ that have the form of finite process graphs with the loop existence and elimination property $\text{LEE}$. We define a variant system $\text{cMil}$ by replacing the fixed-point rule in $\text{Mil}$ with a rule that permits $\text{LEE}$-shaped circular derivations in $\text{Mil$^{\boldsymbol{-}}$}$ from previously derived equations as a premise. With this rule alone we also define the variant system $\text{CLC}$ for merely combining $\text{LEE}$-shaped coinductive proofs over $\text{Mil$^{\boldsymbol{-}}$}$. We show that both $\text{cMil}$ and $\text{CLC}$ have proof interpretations in $\text{Mil}$, and vice versa. As this correspondence links, in both directions, derivability in $\text{Mil}$ with derivation trees of process graphs, it widens the space for graph-based approaches to finding a completeness proof of Milner's system. This report is the extended version of a paper with the same title presented at CALCO 2021.

Robin Milner (1984) gave a sound proof system for bisimilarity of regular expressions interpreted as processes: Basic Process Algebra with unary Kleene star iteration, deadlock 0, successful termination 1, and a fixed-point rule. He asked whether this system is complete. Despite intensive research over the last 35 years, the problem is still open.

Encodings, that is, injective functions from words to words, have been studied extensively in several settings. In computability theory the notion of encoding is crucial for defining computability on arbitrary domains, as well as for comparing the power of models of computation. In language theory much attention has been devoted to regularity preserving functions. A natural question arising in these contexts is: Is there a bijective encoding such that its image function preserves regularity of languages, but its pre-image function does not? Our main result answers this question in the affirmative: For every countable class C of languages there exists a bijective encoding f such that for every language L ∈ L its image f[L] is regular. Our construction of such encodings has several noteworthy consequences. Firstly, anomalies arise when models of computation are compared with respect to a known concept of implementation that is based on encodings which are not required to be computable: Every countable decision model can be implemented, in this sense, by finite-state automata, even via bijective encodings. Hence deterministic finite-state automata would be equally powerful as Turing machine deciders. A second consequence concerns the recognizability of sets of natural numbers via number representations and finite automata. A set of numbers is said to be recognizable with respect to a representation if an automaton accepts the language of representations. Our result entails that there is one number representation with respect to which every recursive set is recognizable.

Increasing sharing in programs is desirable to compactify the code, and to avoid duplication of reduction work at run-time, thereby speeding up execution. We show how a maximal degree of sharing can be obtained for programs expressed as terms in the lambda calculus with letrec. We introduce a notion of 'maximal compactness' for λletrec-terms among all terms with the same infinite unfolding. Instead of defined purely syntactically, this notion is based on a graph semantics. λletrec-terms are interpreted as first-order term graphs so that unfolding equivalence between terms is preserved and reflected through bisimilarity of the term graph interpretations. Compactness of the term graphs can then be compared via functional bisimulation.

We address a problem connected to the unfolding semantics of functional programming languages: give a useful characterization of those infinite lambda-terms that are lambda_{letrec}-expressible in the sense that they arise as infinite unfoldings of terms in lambda_{letrec}, the lambda-calculus with letrec. We provide two characterizations, using concepts we introduce for infinite lambda-terms: regularity, strong regularity, and binding-capturing chains. It turns out that lambda_{letrec}-expressible infinite lambda-terms form a proper subclass of the regular infinite lambda-terms. In this paper we establish these characterizations only for expressibility in lambda_{mu}, the lambda-calculus with explicit mu-recursion. We show that for all infinite lambda-terms T the following are equivalent: (i): T is lambda_{mu}-expressible; (ii): T is strongly regular; (iii): T is regular, and it only has finite binding-capturing chains. We define regularity and strong regularity for infinite lambda-terms as two different generalizations of regularity for infinite first-order terms: as the existence of only finitely many subterms that are defined as the reducts of two rewrite relations for decomposing lambda-terms. These rewrite relations act on infinite lambda-terms furnished with a marked prefix of abstractions for collecting decomposed lambda-abstractions and keeping the terms closed under decomposition. They differ in how vacuous abstractions in the prefix are removed. This report accompanies the article with the same title for the proceedings of the conference RTA 2013, and mainly differs from that by providing the proof of the characterization of lambda_{mu}-expressibility with binding-capturing chains.

We consider infinite sequences of symbols, also known as streams, and the decidability question for equality of streams defined in a restricted format. (Some formats lead to undecidable equivalence problems.) This restricted format consists of prefixing a symbol at the head of a stream, of the stream function `zip', and recursion variables. Here `zip' interleaves the elements of two streams alternatingly. The celebrated Thue- Morse sequence is obtained by the succinct `zip-specification' M = 0 : X X = 1 : zip(X, Y) Y = 0 : zip(Y, X) The main results are as follows. We establish decidability of equivalence of zip-specifications, by employing bisimilarity of observation graphs based on a suitably chosen cobasis. Furthermore, our analysis, based on term rewriting and coalgebraic techniques, reveals an intimate connection between zip-specifications and automatic sequences. This leads to a new and simple characterization of automatic sequences. The study of zip-specifications is placed in a wider perspective by employing observation graphs in a dynamic logic setting, yielding yet another alternative characterization of automatic sequences. By the first characterization result, zip-specifications can be perceived as a term rewriting syntax for automatic sequences. For streams σ the following are equivalent: (a) σ can be specified using zip; (b) σ is 2-automatic; and (c) σ has a finite observation graph using the cobasis (hd, even, odd). Here even and odd are defined by even(a : s) = a : odd(s), and odd(a : s) = even(s). The generalization to zip-k specifications (with zip-k interleaving k streams) and to k-automaticity is straightforward. As a natural extension of the class of automatic sequences, we also consider `zip-mix' specifications that use zips of different arities in one specification. The corresponding notion of automaton employs a state-dependent input-alphabet, with a number representation (n)A = dm... d0where the base of digit di is determined by the automaton A on input di-1... d0. Finally we show that equivalence is undecidable for a simple extension of the zip-mix format with projections analogous to even and odd.

We present some contributions to the theory of infinitary rewriting for weakly orthogonal term rewrite systems, in which critical pairs may occur provided they are trivial. We show that the infinitary unique normal form property (UNinf) fails by a simple example of a weakly orthogonal TRS with two collapsing rules. By translating this example, we show that UNinf also fails for the infinitary lambda-beta-eta-calculus. As positive results we obtain the following: Infinitary confluence, and hence UNinf, holds for weakly orthogonal TRSs that do not contain collapsing rules. To this end we refine the compression lemma. Furthermore, we consider the triangle and diamond properties for infinitary developments in weakly orthogonal TRSs, by refining an earlier cluster-analysis for the finite case.

We solve an open question of Milner [1984]. We define a set of so-called well-behaved finite automata that, modulo bisimulation equivalence, corresponds exactly to the set of regular expressions, and we show how to determine whether a given finite automaton is in this set. As an application, we consider the star height problem.

This paper presents a proof-theoretic observation about two kinds of proof systems for bisimilarity between cyclic term graphs. First we consider proof systems for demonstrating that μ term specifications of cyclic term graphs have the same tree unwinding. We establish a close connection between adaptations for μ terms over a general first-order signature of the coinductive axiomatisation of recursive type equivalence by Brandt and Henglein (Brandt and Henglein 1998) and of a proof system by Ariola and Klop (Ariola and Klop 1995) for consistency checking. We show that there exists a simple duality by mirroring between derivations in the former system and formalised consistency checks, which are called ‘consistency unfoldings', in the latter. This result sheds additional light on the axiomatisation of Brandt and Henglein: it provides an alternative soundness proof for the adaptation considered here. We then outline an analogous duality result that holds for a pair of similar proof systems for proving that equational specifications of cyclic term graphs are bisimilar.