Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark R. Verardo

dblp:45/3507 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › multimodal data mining
multimedia data mining
0.112005
ViVo: Visual Vocabulary Construction for Mining Biomedical Images · ICDM 2005
Data mining › dimensionality reduction
feature extraction
0.012005
ViVo: Visual Vocabulary Construction for Mining Biomedical Images · ICDM 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

texture features · 0.1color histogram · 0.1PCA · 0.1ICA · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 ViVo: Visual Vocabulary Construction for Mining Biomedical Images
abstract
Given a large collection of medical images of several conditions and treatments, how can we succinctly describe the characteristics of each setting? For example, given a large collection of retinal images from several different experimental conditions (normal, detached, reattached, etc.), how can data mining help biologists focus on important regions in the images or on the differences between different experimental conditions? If the images were text documents, we could find the main terms and concepts for each condition by existing IR methods (e.g., tf/idf and LSI). We propose something analogous, but for the much more challenging case of an image collection: We propose to automatically develop a visual vocabulary by breaking images into n /spl times/ n tiles and deriving key tiles ("ViVos") for each image and condition. We experiment with numerous domain-independent ways of extracting features from tiles (color histograms, textures, etc.), and several ways of choosing characteristic tiles (PCA, ICA). We perform experiments on two disparate biomedical datasets. The quantitative measure of success is classification accuracy: Our "ViVos" achieve high classification accuracy (up to 83 %for a nine-class problem on feline retinal images). More importantly, qualitatively, our "ViVos" do an excellent job as "visual vocabulary terms": they have biological meaning, as corroborated by domain experts; they help spot characteristic regions of images, exactly like text vocabulary terms do for documents; and they highlight the differences between pairs of images.
Arnab Bhattacharya 0001, Vebjorn Ljosa, Jia-Yu Pan, Mark R. Verardo, Christos Faloutsos, Ambuj K. Singh
ICDM4