Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael J. West

dblp:45/3686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Storage systems · 80% Distributed systems · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › file systems
distributed file system
0.031988
Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 1988
Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987
The ITC Distributed File System: Principles and Design · SOSP 1985
Distributed systems › peer-to-peer systems
file sharing
0.011987
Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987
Storage systems › file systems
scalable file system
0.011987
Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract) · SOSP 1987
Storage systems
file systems
0.011985
The ITC Distributed File System: Principles and Design · SOSP 1985
Storage systems › file systems
file system design
0.011985
The ITC Distributed File System: Principles and Design · SOSP 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trace analysis · 0.0system design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System
abstract
The Andrew File System is a location-transparent distributed tile system that will eventually span more than 5000 workstations at Carnegie Mellon University. Large scale affects performance and complicates system operation. In this paper we present observations of a prototype implementation, motivate changes in the areas of cache validation, server process structure, name translation, and low-level storage representation, and quantitatively demonstrate Andrews ability to scale gracefully. We establish the importance of whole-file transfer and caching in Andrew by comparing its performance with that of Sun Microsystems NFS tile system. We also show how the aggregation of files into volumes improves the operability of the system.
John H. Howard, Michael L. Kazar, Sherri G. Menees, David A. Nichols, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Robert N. Sidebotham, Michael J. West
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.7
1987 Scale and Performance in a Distributed File System (Extended Abstract)
abstract
Andrew is a distributed computing environment being developed in a joint project by Carnegie Mellon University and IBM. One of the major components of Andrew is a distributed file system which constitutes underlying mechanism for sharing information. The goals of the Andrew file system are to support growth up to at least 7000 workstations (one for each student, faculty member, and staff at Carnegie Mellon) while providing users, application programs, and system administrators with the amenities of a shared file system.
John H. Howard, Michael L. Kazar, Sherri G. Menees, David A. Nichols, Mahadev Satyanarayanan, Robert N. Sidebotham, Michael J. West
SOSP7
1985 The ITC Distributed File System: Principles and Design
Mahadev Satyanarayanan, John H. Howard, David A. Nichols, Robert N. Sidebotham, Alfred Z. Spector, Michael J. West
SOSP6