Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Weiwei Li 0006
dblp:45/3709-6
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7402-6874ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% Reinforcement learning · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 59% Data mining · 22% Recommender systems · 19% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table Understanding · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document understanding
table understanding |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table Understanding · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GAS: Large-Scale Heterogeneous Personalization in Social Network Applications at Meta · KDD (2) 2025 |
Data mining › clustering
user clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GAS: Large-Scale Heterogeneous Personalization in Social Network Applications at Meta · KDD (2) 2025 |
Information retrieval › ranking › ranking model
multi-stage ranking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving a Better Tradeoff in Multi-stage Recommender Systems through Personalization · KDD 2024 |
Recommender systems › large-scale recommendation
multi-stage recommender systems |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving a Better Tradeoff in Multi-stage Recommender Systems through Personalization · KDD 2024 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Achieving a Better Tradeoff in Multi-stage Recommender Systems through Personalization · KDD 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
heterogeneous treatment effect estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interpretable Personalized Experimentation · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.0multi-agent collaboration · 1.0offline estimation · 0.9feature-threshold segmentation · 0.9ParallAX · 0.9submodular optimization · 0.8DR-submodularity · 0.8black-box HTE explanation · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mixture-of-Minds: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Table UnderstandingabstractYuhang Zhou, Mingrui Zhang, Ke Li, Mingyi Wang, Qiao Liu, Qifei Wang, Jiayi Liu, Fei Liu, Serena Li, Weiwei LI, Mingze Gao, Abhishek Kumar, Xiangjun Fan, Zhuokai Zhao, Lizhu Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Qifei Wang, Serena Li, Weiwei Li 0006, Xiangjun Fan, Zhuokai Zhao, Lizhu Zhang |
ACL (1) | 10 |
| 2025 | GAS: Large-Scale Heterogeneous Personalization in Social Network Applications at MetaabstractIn this paper, we introduce the Generalized Auto Segmentation (GAS), an end-to-end, cross-domain personalization platform developed at Meta. GAS is designed to optimize personalization policies for online experiments, operating independently of any specific server infrastructure. Our process begins with a seed experiment to collect user data, which is followed by feature logging and selection. User segmentation is then performed using a feature-threshold method. Specifically, we utilize simple combinations of single or dual features to identify concise, explainable, and sustainable user cohorts that enhance both business outcomes and user experience over the long term. Treatments and the reward function for these segments are refined through ParallAX, a novel methodology at Meta that uses offline estimates to optimize online metrics, ensuring impactful and precisely tailored interventions for diverse user groups. The deployment of GAS across various Meta productions has demonstrated its efficiency and effectiveness. Yihan Wu 0007, Weiwei Li 0006, Kevin Han, Junfeng Pan, Jiawei Wen, Gedi Zhou |
KDD (2) | 4 |
| 2024 | Achieving a Better Tradeoff in Multi-stage Recommender Systems through PersonalizationabstractRecommender systems in social media websites provide value to their communities by recommending engaging content and meaningful connections. Scaling high-quality recommendations to billions of users in real-time requires sophisticated ranking models operating on a vast number of potential items to recommend, becoming prohibitively expensive computationally. A common technique "funnels'' these items through progressively complex models ("multi-stage''), each ranking fewer items but at higher computational cost for greater accuracy. This architecture introduces a trade-off between the cost of ranking items and providing users with the best recommendations. A key observation we make in this paper is that, all else equal, ranking more items indeed improves the overall objective but has diminishing returns. Following this observation, we provide a rigorous formulation through the framework of DR-submodularity, and argue that for a certain class of objectives (reward functions), it is possible to improve the trade-off between performance and computational cost in multi-stage ranking systems with strong theoretical guarantees. We show that this class of reward functions that provide this guarantee is large and robust to various noise models. Finally, we describe extensive experimentation of our method on three real-world recommender systems in Facebook, achieving 8.8% reduction in overall compute resources with no significant impact on recommendation quality, compared to a 0.8% quality loss in a non-personalized budget allocation. Ariel Evnine, Stratis Ioannidis, Dimitris Kalimeris, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Weiwei Li 0006, Israel Nir, Udi Weinsberg |
KDD | 5 |
| 2022 | Interpretable Personalized ExperimentationabstractBlack-box heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) models are increasingly being used to create personalized policies that assign individuals to their optimal treatments. However, they are difficult to understand, and can be burdensome to maintain in a production environment. In this paper, we present a scalable, interpretable personalized experimentation system, implemented and deployed in production at Meta. The system works in a multiple treatment, multiple outcome setting typical at Meta to: (1) learn explanations for black-box HTE models; (2) generate interpretable personalized policies. We evaluate the methods used in the system on publicly available data and Meta use cases, and discuss lessons learnt during the development of the system. Sarah Tan, Weiwei Li 0006, Mia Garrard, Adam Obeng, Drew Dimmery, Shaun Singh, Hanson Wang, Daniel R. Jiang, Eytan Bakshy |
KDD | 3 |