Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vincent De Sapio

dblp:45/4394 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 94% Robot manipulation · 6%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
holonomic constraints
0.122006
The Control of Kinematically Constrained Shoulder Complexes: Physiological and Humanoid Examples · ICRA 2006
Operational Space Control of Multibody Systems with Explicit Holonomic Constraints · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.122006
The Control of Kinematically Constrained Shoulder Complexes: Physiological and Humanoid Examples · ICRA 2006
Operational Space Control of Multibody Systems with Explicit Holonomic Constraints · ICRA 2005
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
operational space control
0.112005
Operational Space Control of Multibody Systems with Explicit Holonomic Constraints · ICRA 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task-level control framework · 0.1multiplier approach · 0.1minimization approach · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 An approach and implementation for coupling neurocognitive and neuromechanical models
abstract
The neuromechanics of human motion are generally represented in the literature by feedforward control mechanisms: the brain sends a control signal to a part of the body to move, and motion ensues. Thus neuromechanical commands for motion are influenced by control signals from neurocognitive inputs. However, feedback also exists from the neuromechanical system to the neurocognitive one, so that subsequent decisions related to motor commands are influenced by the motion itself. Recent work suggests that accounting for bidirectional feedback, both from neurocognitive to neuromechanical systems and from neuromechanical to neurocognitive ones, allows for more robust accounts of behavior. In this paper, we describe a neurocognitive model, a neuromechanical model, and a simple bidirectional feedback mechanism to couple the two systems. We then show that the behavior of the combined system is determined by the interaction of coupling strength and properties of the mechanical and cognitive models.
Stephanie Goldfarb, Darren Earl, Vincent De Sapio, Misagh Mansouri, Jeffrey A. Reinbolt
SMC3
2010 Using Cloud Constructs and Predictive Analysis to Enable Pre-Failure Process Migration in HPC Systems
abstract
Accurate failure prediction in conjunction with efficient process migration facilities including some Cloud constructs can enable failure avoidance in large-scale high performance computing (HPC) platforms. In this work we demonstrate a prototype system that incorporates our probabilistic failure prediction system with virtualization mechanisms and techniques to provide a whole system approach to failure avoidance. This work utilizes a failure scenario based on a real-world HPC case study.
Jim M. Brandt, Frank Chen 0001, Vincent De Sapio, Ann C. Gentile, Jackson R. Mayo, Philippe P. Pébay, Diana C. Roe, David C. Thompson 0001, Matthew Wong
CCGRID3
2006 The Control of Kinematically Constrained Shoulder Complexes: Physiological and Humanoid Examples
abstract
This paper applies a task-level approach to the control of holonomically constrained shoulder models. These models include a biomechanical representation based on human physiology and a robotic design based on a parallel-serial structure. Both models involve complex kinematically coupled motion between the shoulder girdle and the humerus. This coupled motion has a significant impact on the resulting humeral pointing dynamics associated with arm movement. The constrained task-level control approach implemented here characterizes and exploits the kinematically coupled nature of these systems by casting the constrained dynamics into a task-level control framework. Examples are presented which illustrate the effectiveness of this approach
Vincent De Sapio, Katherine Holzbaur, Oussama Khatib
ICRA1
2005 Operational Space Control of Multibody Systems with Explicit Holonomic Constraints
abstract
This paper presents an operational space control approach for the general class of holonomically constrained multibody systems. As a point of departure, the general formulation of constrained dynamical systems is addressed using multiplier and minimization approaches. The constrained dynamics problem is interpreted with respect to its underlying symmetry with task space dynamics. A framework for constrained operational space control is then presented which casts the general formulation of constrained multibody systems into a task space setting. This provides a means of exploiting natural task-level control structures within the constrained environment. A set of examples illustrate this control implementation.
Vincent De Sapio, Oussama Khatib
ICRA1
2005 Simulating the task-level control of human motion: a methodology and framework for implementation
Vincent De Sapio, James Warren, Oussama Khatib, Scott L. Delp
Vis. Comput.1