Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Guy Pardon

dblp:45/5762 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 91% Distributed and cloud data management · 9%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control
correctness criteria
0.011999
Correctness in General Configurations of Transactional Components · PODS 1999
Transaction processing and concurrency control
concurrency control
0.011999
Correctness in General Configurations of Transactional Components · PODS 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

proof technique for arbitrary configurations · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 CheeTah: a Lightweight Transaction Server for Plug-and-Play Internet Data Management
Guy Pardon, Gustavo Alonso
VLDB1
1999 Transactions in Stack, Fork, and Join Composite Systems
Gustavo Alonso, Armin Fessler, Guy Pardon, Hans-Jörg Schek
ICDT3
1999 Correctness in General Configurations of Transactional Components
abstract
From a transactional point of view, composite systems are component based applications in which each component has its own transaction management logic.These systems are highly relevant in practice since they are likely to be the standard architecture for many future distributed applications.Unfortunately,there is no appropriate conceptual framework in which to reason about such systems.Following up on existing work that addressed special cases of composite systems, in this paper we tackle the problem of general composite systems, i.e., those with arbitrary configurations.We propose a correctness criterion, develop a new proof technique that allows us to address arbitrary configurations, and discuss several important issues related to concurrency control in distributed systems.
Gustavo Alonso, Armin Fessler, Guy Pardon, Hans-Jörg Schek
PODS3