Ryan Stedman

dblp:45/585 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 50% Usability and user experience research · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research
error detection
0.112010
Estimating residual error rate in recognized handwritten documents using artificial error injection · CHI 2010
Health and well-being technologies
health informatics
0.112010
Estimating residual error rate in recognized handwritten documents using artificial error injection · CHI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.1artificial error injection · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Aiding human discovery of handwriting recognition errors
abstract
Handwriting recognizers occasionally misinterpret digital ink input, requiring users to compare their ink input and the recognizer output to identify and correct errors. Technologies like Anoto pens can make this error discovery and correction task more difficult, because verification of recognizer output may occur many hours after data input and may involve the verification of many documents. In this paper, we explore the design space for error discovery aids geared toward "out-of-the-moment" verification. We present three discovery techniques, a visual proximity technique, a multimodal technique, and a character manipulation technique, and analyze the performance of our techniques. Experimental results show that the visual proximity technique outperforms all others in number of errors caught, and is also significantly better than a control technique. This paper is the first experimental study of techniques that aid in the discovery of handwriting recognition errors.
Ryan Stedman, Michael A. Terry, Edward Lank
ICMI1
2010 Estimating residual error rate in recognized handwritten documents using artificial error injection
abstract
Both handwriting recognition systems and their users are error prone. Handwriting recognizers make recognition errors, and users may miss those errors when verifying output. As a result, it is common for recognized documents to contain residual errors. Unfortunately, in some application domains (e.g. health informatics), tolerance for residual errors in recognized handwriting may be very low, and a desire might exist to maximize user accuracy during verification. In this paper, we present a technique that allows us to measure the performance of a user verifying recognizer output. We inject artificial errors into a set of recognized handwritten forms and show that the rate of injected errors and recognition errors caught is highly correlated in real time. Systems supporting user verification can make use of this measure of user accuracy in a variety of ways. For example, they can force users to slow down or can highlight injected errors that were missed, thus encouraging users to take more care.
Edward Lank, Ryan Stedman, Michael A. Terry
CHI2
2008 A user study of off-the-record messaging
abstract
Instant messaging is a prevalent form of communication across the Internet, yet most instant messaging services provide little security against eavesdroppers or impersonators. There are a variety of existing systems that aim to solve this problem, but the one that provides the highest level of privacy is Off-the-Record Messaging (OTR), which aims to give instant messaging conversations the level of privacy available in a face-to-face conversation. In the most recent redesign of OTR, as well as increasing the security of the protocol, one of the goals of the designers was to make OTR easier to use, without users needing to understand details of computer security such as keys or fingerprints.
Ryan Stedman, Kayo Yoshida, Ian Goldberg 0001
SOUPS1