Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sara R. Biyabani
dblp:45/5856
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
distributed real-time systems |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The Integration of Deadline and Criticalness in Hard Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 1988 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
heuristic scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The Integration of Deadline and Criticalness in Hard Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 1988 |
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The Integration of Deadline and Criticalness in Hard Real-Time Scheduling · RTSS 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | The Integration of Deadline and Criticalness in Hard Real-Time SchedulingabstractTwo task-scheduling algorithms for distributed hard real-time computer systems are presented. Both algorithms are based on a heuristic approach and explicitly account for both the deadlines and criticality of tasks when making scheduling decisions. In analyzing the algorithms, a performance metric called the weighted guarantee ratio is defined. It reflects both the percentage of tasks that make their deadlines and their relative worth to the system. The performance is analyzed by simulating the behavior of the algorithms as well as that of several other pertinent baseline algorithms under a wide range of system conditions including a nonhomogeneous task arrival rate. The results show that the algorithms outperform all the baseline algorithms except for the ideal but impractical centralized baseline and in many cases perform close to the ideal.> Sara R. Biyabani, John A. Stankovic, Krithi Ramamritham |
RTSS | 1 |