Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian W. Minten

dblp:45/5972 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › cognitive human-robot interaction
situational awareness
0.112006
Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robot · HRI 2006
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation
0.112006
Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robot · HRI 2006
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
docking
0.012001
Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › docking
vision-based docking
0.012001
Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › behavior-based control
reactive behavior
0.012001
Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

within-subjects experiment · 0.1region statistics · 0.0imprinting · 0.0color segmentation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robot
abstract
Polymorphic, or shape-shifting, robots can normally tackle more types of tasks than non-polymorphic robots due to their flexible morphology. Their versatility adds to the challenge of designing a human interface, however. To investigate the utility of providing awareness information about the robot's physical configuration (or "pose"), we performed a within-subjects experiment with presence or absence of pose information being the independent variable. We found that participants were more likely to tip the robot or have it ride up on obstacles when they used the display that lacked pose information and also more likely to move the robot to the highest position to become oriented. There was no significant difference in the number of times that participants bumped into obstacles, however, indicating that having more awareness of the robot's state does not affect awareness of the robots' immediate surroundings. Participants thought the display with pose information was easier to use, helped their performance and was more enjoyable than having no pose information. Future research directions point toward providing recommendations to robot operators for which pose they should change to given the terrain to be traversed.
Jill L. Drury, Holly A. Yanco, Whitney Howell, Brian W. Minten, Jennifer Casper
HRI4
2001 Low-order-complexity vision-based docking
abstract
This paper reports on a reactive docking behavior which uses a vision algorithm that grows linearly with the number of image pixels. The docking robot imprints (initializes) on a two-colored docking fiducial upon departing from the dock, then uses region statistics to adapt the color segmentation in changing lighting conditions. The docking behavior was implemented on a marsupial team of robots, where a daughter micro-rover had to reenter the mother robot from an approach zone with a 2 m radius and 140/spl deg/ angular width with a tolerance of /spl plusmn/5 and /spl plusmn/2 cm. Testing during outdoor conditions (noon, dusk) and challenging indoor scenarios (flashing lights) showed that using adaptation and imprinting was more robust than using imprinting atone.
Brian W. Minten, Robin R. Murphy, Jeff Hyams, Mark Micire
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom.1