Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian W. Minten
dblp:45/5972
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Robot navigation and mapping · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › cognitive human-robot interaction
situational awareness |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robot · HRI 2006 |
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robot · HRI 2006 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
docking |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › docking
vision-based docking |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › behavior-based control
reactive behavior |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Low-order-complexity vision-based docking · IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
within-subjects experiment · 0.1region statistics · 0.0imprinting · 0.0color segmentation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Changing shape: improving situation awareness for a polymorphic robotabstractPolymorphic, or shape-shifting, robots can normally tackle more types of tasks than non-polymorphic robots due to their flexible morphology. Their versatility adds to the challenge of designing a human interface, however. To investigate the utility of providing awareness information about the robot's physical configuration (or "pose"), we performed a within-subjects experiment with presence or absence of pose information being the independent variable. We found that participants were more likely to tip the robot or have it ride up on obstacles when they used the display that lacked pose information and also more likely to move the robot to the highest position to become oriented. There was no significant difference in the number of times that participants bumped into obstacles, however, indicating that having more awareness of the robot's state does not affect awareness of the robots' immediate surroundings. Participants thought the display with pose information was easier to use, helped their performance and was more enjoyable than having no pose information. Future research directions point toward providing recommendations to robot operators for which pose they should change to given the terrain to be traversed. Jill L. Drury, Holly A. Yanco, Whitney Howell, Brian W. Minten, Jennifer Casper |
HRI | 4 |
| 2001 | Low-order-complexity vision-based dockingabstractThis paper reports on a reactive docking behavior which uses a vision algorithm that grows linearly with the number of image pixels. The docking robot imprints (initializes) on a two-colored docking fiducial upon departing from the dock, then uses region statistics to adapt the color segmentation in changing lighting conditions. The docking behavior was implemented on a marsupial team of robots, where a daughter micro-rover had to reenter the mother robot from an approach zone with a 2 m radius and 140/spl deg/ angular width with a tolerance of /spl plusmn/5 and /spl plusmn/2 cm. Testing during outdoor conditions (noon, dusk) and challenging indoor scenarios (flashing lights) showed that using adaptation and imprinting was more robust than using imprinting atone. Brian W. Minten, Robin R. Murphy, Jeff Hyams, Mark Micire |
IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom. | 1 |