Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alasdair Rawsthorne

dblp:45/6091 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
High-performance computing · 50% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Compilers and program optimization › parallel program optimization › synchronization optimization
synchronization elimination
0.011995
Compiling and Optimizing for Decoupled Architectures · SC 1995
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
latency hiding
0.011995
Compiling and Optimizing for Decoupled Architectures · SC 1995
High-performance computing › supercomputing
supercomputer performance
0.011995
Compiling and Optimizing for Decoupled Architectures · SC 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compiler optimization · 0.0benchmark evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Evaluation of dynamic binary translation techniques for full system virtualisation on ARMv7-A
Niels Penneman, Danielius Kudinskas, Alasdair Rawsthorne, Bjorn De Sutter, Koen De Bosschere
J. Syst. Archit.3
2013 Formal virtualization requirements for the ARM architecture
Niels Penneman, Danielius Kudinskas, Alasdair Rawsthorne, Bjorn De Sutter, Koen De Bosschere
J. Syst. Archit.3
1999 Consistent windowing interfaces in distributed heterogeneous environments
Daniel Owen, Alasdair Rawsthorne
DAIS2
1995 Compiling and Optimizing for Decoupled Architectures
abstract
Decoupled architectures provide a key to the problem of sustained supercomputer performance through their ability to hide large memory latencies. When a program executes in a decoupled mode the perceived memory latency at the processor is zero; effectively the entire physical memory has an access time equivalent to the processor's register file, and latency is completely hidden. However, the asynchronous functional units within a decoupled architecture must occasionally synchronize, incurring a high penalty. The goal of compiling and optimizing for decoupled architectures is to partition the program between the asynchronous functional units in such a way that latencies are hidden but synchronization events are executed infrequently. This paper describes a model for decoupled compilation, and explains the effectiveness of compilation for decoupled systems. A number of new compiler optimizations are introduced and evaluated quantitatively using the Perfect Club scientific benchmarks. We show that with a suitable repertoire of optimizations, it is possible to hide large latencies most of the time for most of the programs in the Perfect Club.
Nigel P. Topham, Alasdair Rawsthorne, Callum McLean, Muriel Mewissen, Peter L. Bird
SC2
1993 The Effectiveness of Decoupling
abstract
This paper examines the effectiveness of decoupling as an optimization technique for high-performance computer architectures. Decoupled access execute architectures are described, and the concept of control decoupling is introduced and justified. A description of a highly-decoupled architecture is given, and a metric for the effectiveness of decoupling on particular programs, the Loss of Decoupling frequency is introduced. Finally, a number of real benchmark programs are examined and the applicability of decoupling them is analyzed.
Peter L. Bird, Alasdair Rawsthorne, Nigel P. Topham
International Conference on Supercomputing2