EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinglie Dou
dblp:45/6484
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1984
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Database system architecture and tuning · 50% Distributed and cloud data management · 50% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed database design |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Distributed and cloud data management › data placement
fragment allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Database system architecture and tuning › database design
physical database design |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Database system architecture and tuning › database design › physical database design
vertical partitioning |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Memory systems
memory hierarchy |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Memory systems › memory hierarchy
two-level memory system |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database Design · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1984 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
empirical objective functions · 0.0cost optimization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1984 | Vertical Partitioning Algorithms for Database DesignabstractThis paper addresses the vertical partitioning of a set of logical records or a relation into fragments. The rationale behind vertical partitioning is to produce fragments, groups of attribute columns, that “closely match” the requirements of transactions. Vertical partitioning is applied in three contexts: a database stored on devices of a single type, a database stored in different memory levels, and a distributed database. In a two-level memory hierarchy, most transactions should be processed using the fragments in primary memory. In distributed databases, fragment allocation should maximize the amount of local transaction processing. Fragments may be nonoverlapping or overlapping. A two-phase approach for the determination of fragments is proposed; in the first phase, the design is driven by empirical objective functions which do not require specific cost information. The second phase performs cost optimization by incorporating the knowledge of a specific application environment. The algorithms presented in this paper have been implemented, and examples of their actual use are shown. Shamkant B. Navathe, Stefano Ceri, Gio Wiederhold, Jinglie Dou |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 4 |