Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Carter

dblp:45/7456 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-0090-5868ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Graph data management · 38% Query processing and optimization · 27% Distributed and cloud data management · 21%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computational photography and imaging · 50% Visual content generation and editing · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 77% User interface design and tools · 23%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Indexing and storage engines
concurrent index
0.412019
Nanosecond Indexing of Graph Data With Hash Maps and VLists · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Graph data management
graph indexing
0.412019
Nanosecond Indexing of Graph Data With Hash Maps and VLists · SIGMOD Conference 2019
Graph data management › graph database
distributed graph database
0.312018
Partial Update: Efficient Materialized View Maintenance in a Distributed Graph Database · ICDE 2018
Distributed and cloud data management
eventual consistency
0.312018
Partial Update: Efficient Materialized View Maintenance in a Distributed Graph Database · ICDE 2018
Query processing and optimization › view maintenance
incremental view maintenance
0.312018
Partial Update: Efficient Materialized View Maintenance in a Distributed Graph Database · ICDE 2018
Query processing and optimization
view maintenance
0.312018
Partial Update: Efficient Materialized View Maintenance in a Distributed Graph Database · ICDE 2018
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed data store
0.212016
Moolle: Fan-out control for scalable distributed data stores · ICDE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

request control · 0.5replication-based partitioning · 0.5partial update · 0.3delta change computation · 0.3image understanding · 0.2design knowledge · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Nanosecond Indexing of Graph Data With Hash Maps and VLists
abstract
We introduce a wait-free, multi-reader, single-writer, "kill -9" durable, indexing structure for in-memory social graph databases. This structure requires no communication from the readers back to the writer, allowing for trivial read scalability and isolation. We support online updates without compromising availability or read performance. Our structure supports looking up small subgraphs in 80 nanoseconds and a materialization rate of 12 nanoseconds per edge. Storage takes 7 bytes per edge per index and supports almost 1 million online writes per second.
Andrew Carter, Andrew Rodriguez, Scott Meyer
SIGMOD Conference1
2018 Partial Update: Efficient Materialized View Maintenance in a Distributed Graph Database
abstract
In order to efficiently serve a high volume of queries, LinkedIn's distributed graph service caches computationally-expensive materialized views. Despite this, even basic view maintenance has been a scalability bottleneck. In this paper, we introduce Partial Update, which efficiently applies incremental view maintenance in the absence of deletions in a materialized view. Without expensive transaction handling, Partial Update guarantees eventual consistency across source of truth databases, materialized views and base relations stores. By design, its delta change computation logic only produces lightweight queries, reducing any need to augment the underlying data storage systems. This allows Partial Update to seamlessly integrate on top of traditional eventually consistent systems. In LinkedIn's production systems, Partial Update achieves up to a 50% reduction in both maintenance time and network bandwidth utilization. The improved view maintenance scalability allows us to improve the quality of cached data by a factor of 20. We consider that Partial Update is general enough to be applicable to the majority of select-project-join view maintenance strategies in eventually consistent distributed data stores.
SungJu Cho, Roman Averbukh, Andrew Carter, Jane Alam Jan
ICDE4
2016 Moolle: Fan-out control for scalable distributed data stores
abstract
Many Online Social Networks horizontally partition data across data stores. This allows the addition of server nodes to increase capacity and throughput. For single key lookup queries such as computing a member's 1st degree connections, clients need to generate only one request to one data store. However, for multi key lookup queries such as computing a 2nd degree network, clients need to generate multiple requests to multiple data stores. The number of requests to fulfill the multi key lookup queries grows in relation to the number of partitions. Increasing the number of server nodes in order to increase capacity also increases the number of requests between the client and data stores. This may increase the latency of the query response time because of network congestion, tail-latency, and CPU bounding. Replication based partitioning strategies can reduce the number of requests in the multi key lookup queries. However, reducing the number of requests in a query can degrade the performance of certain queries where processing, computing, and filtering can be done by the data stores. A better system would provide the capability of controlling the number of requests in a query. This paper presents Moolle, a system of controlling the number of requests in queries to scalable distributed data stores. Moolle has been implemented in the LinkedIn distributed graph service that serves hundreds of thousands of social graph traversal queries per second. We believe that Moolle can be applied to other distributed systems that handle distributed data processing with a high volume of variable-sized requests.
SungJu Cho, Andrew Carter, Joshua Ehrlich, Jane Alam Jan
ICDE2
2009 MagicPhotobook: designer inspired, user perfected photo albums
abstract
Computer-assisted photo album creation continues to be a challenging application as it requires integrated technical solutions to many difficult problems. Effective solutions must leverage both design knowledge and image understanding algorithms to automate time-consuming tasks like image selection, grouping, cropping, layout and background selection. At the same time, they should allow the user to cater to personal tastes by fine-tuning aspects of album appearance. MagicPhotobook is a photobook authoring system that takes steps in these directions by providing advances over prior solutions in the following areas: automatic image selection and theme-based image grouping; dynamic page layout; automatic cropping; automatic background selection; design-preserving background artwork transformation; and a simple yet powerful user interface for personalization.
Yuli Gao, Clayton Brian Atkins, Phil Cheatle, Jun Xiao 0003, Hui Chao, Daniel Tretter, David Slatter, Andrew Carter, Roland Penny, Chris Willis 0002
ACM Multimedia10