Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kai Blin

dblp:46/11249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3764-6051ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
enzyme function prediction
1.012026
PhyloNaP: a user-friendly database of phylogeny for natural product-producing enzymes · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
phylogenetics
1.012026
PhyloNaP: a user-friendly database of phylogeny for natural product-producing enzymes · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics › phylogenetic inference
phylogenetic placement
1.012026
PhyloNaP: a user-friendly database of phylogeny for natural product-producing enzymes · Bioinform. 2026
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PhyloNaP: a user-friendly database of phylogeny for natural product-producing enzymes
abstract
SUMMARY: Phylogenetic analysis is widely used to predict enzyme function, yet building annotated and reusable trees is labor-intensive and requires extensive knowledge about the specific enzymes. Existing resources rarely cover biosynthetic enzymes and lack the context needed for meaningful analysis. We present PhyloNaP, the first large-scale resource dedicated to phylogenies of biosynthetic enzymes. PhyloNaP provides ∼51 000 annotated and interactive trees enriched with chemical, functional, and taxonomic information. Users can classify their own sequences via phylogenetic placement, enabling functional inference in an evolutionary context. A contribution portal allows the community to submit curated trees. By combining scale, breadth of annotation, and interactive functionality, PhyloNaP fills a major gap in bioinformatics resources for enzyme discovery and annotation, with immediate applications to secondary metabolism and beyond. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Freely available on the web at https://phylonap.cs.uni-tuebingen.de.
Aleksandra Korenskaia, Martina Adamek, Judit Szenei, Lisa Vader, Kai Blin, Tillmann Weber, Nadine Ziemert
Bioinform.5
2025 Strategies for community-sourced biocuration in bioinformatics: a case study on MIBiG 4.0
abstract
Biocuration is essential to transform molecular sequence data into standardized, machine-readable resources. Such curated datasets enable comparative analysis, predictive modeling, and data integration across bioinformatics platforms. While professional biocuration is resource-intensive and usually limited to institutional settings, community-driven approaches can mobilize large-scale annotation of specialized datasets and are more resilient to disruptions in scientific funding. Here, we present a model for community-powered curation applied to the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (MIBiG) repository. Through a framework of workflows for metadata capture, annotation validation, and contributor coordination, the MIBiG 4.0 initiative recruited 267 scientists across 178 institutions from 33 countries, volunteering an estimated 4000 h of work. These efforts expanded the MIBiG repository by 22% and enhanced its usability in downstream molecular data analyses in comparative genomic analyses, natural product discovery, and machine learning applications. We provide strategies and actionable lessons for adopting this model, supporting the sustainability of curated bioinformatics resources central to nucleic acid research and related fields.
Kai Blin, Catarina Loureiro, Nico l L. Louwen, Jorge C. Navarro-Muñoz, Hans Gerstmans, Serina L. Robinson, Adriano Rutz, Zachary L. Reitz, Drew T. Doering, Justin J. J. van der Hooft, Tilmann Weber, Marnix H. Medema, Mitja Zdouc
Briefings Bioinform.1
2019 Recent development of antiSMASH and other computational approaches to mine secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters
abstract
Many drugs are derived from small molecules produced by microorganisms and plants, so-called natural products. Natural products have diverse chemical structures, but the biosynthetic pathways producing those compounds are often organized as biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) and follow a highly conserved biosynthetic logic. This allows for the identification of core biosynthetic enzymes using genome mining strategies that are based on the sequence similarity of the involved enzymes/genes. However, mining for a variety of BGCs quickly approaches a complexity level where manual analyses are no longer possible and require the use of automated genome mining pipelines, such as the antiSMASH software. In this review, we discuss the principles underlying the predictions of antiSMASH and other tools and provide practical advice for their application. Furthermore, we discuss important caveats such as rule-based BGC detection, sequence and annotation quality and cluster boundary prediction, which all have to be considered while planning for, performing and analyzing the results of genome mining studies.
Kai Blin, Hyun Uk Kim, Marnix H. Medema, Tilmann Weber
Briefings Bioinform.1
2016 Ten Simple Rules for Taking Advantage of Git and GitHub
abstract
Bioinformatics is a broad discipline in which one common denominator is the need to produce and/or use software that can be applied to biological data in different contexts. To enable and ensure the replicability and traceability of scientific claims, it is essential that the scientific publication, the corresponding datasets, and the data analysis are made publicly available [1,2]. All software used for the analysis should be either carefully documented (e.g., for commercial software) or, better yet, openly shared and directly accessible to others [3,4]. The rise of openly available software and source code alongside concomitant collaborative development is facilitated by the existence of several code repository services such as SourceForge, Bitbucket, GitLab, and GitHub, among others. These resources are also essential for collaborative software projects because they enable the organization and sharing of programming tasks between different remote contributors. Here, we introduce the main features of GitHub, a popular web-based platform that offers a free and integrated environment for hosting the source code, documentation, and project-related web content for open-source projects. GitHub also offers paid plans for private repositories (see Box 1) for individuals and businesses as well as free plans including private repositories for research and educational use.
Yasset Pérez-Riverol, Laurent Gatto, Timo Sachsenberg, Julian Uszkoreit, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Christian Fufezan, Tobias Ternent, Stephen J. Eglen, Daniel S. Katz, Tom J. Pollard, Olexandr Konovalov, Robert M. Flight, Kai Blin, Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
PLoS Comput. Biol.14